• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[内镜联合超声引导穿刺:内镜联合肾内手术中的超声引导穿刺]

[Endoscopic combined ultrasound-guided access ultrasound-guided access in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery].

作者信息

Kang N, Jiang Y H, Jiang Y G, Wu L Y, Zhang J Q, Niu Y N, Zhang J H

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Aug 18;52(4):692-696. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.018.

DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.018
PMID:32773803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7433628/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of endoscopic combined ultrasound-guided access (EUGA) with the conventional ultrasound-guided access (UGA) to achieve percutaneous renal access in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 53 patients undergoing ECIRS to treat upper urinary tract calculi between January 2017 and October 2019 was con-ducted. All of the cases were of complex upper urinary tract stones larger than 2 cm in diameter. The com-plex stone situations, such as multiple renal calyces calculi or staghorn calculi necessitated ECIRS. Under general anesthesia, the patients were placed in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position, thus allowing both antegrade and retrograde accesss. The patients were divided to UGA and EUGA groups according to the protocol of achieving percutaneous renal access. In 28 cases, endoscopic combined ultrasound-guided accesss were obtained. Puncture and dilation were performed under direct flexible ureteroscopic visualization, while percutaneous renal access of 25 cases were performed with the conventional technique employing ultrasound guidance. Demographic and perioperative information, such as stone burden, presence of hydronephrosis and number of calyces involved was compared. Primary outcomes included total operative time, renal access time, repeat puncture, hemoglobin level, perioperative complications, and stone-free rate.

RESULTS

No major intra-operative complication was recorded in all the 53 ECRIS. No significant difference was observed between the groups in age and gender. There was no significant difference in body mass index[BMI (29.21±3.14) kg/m .(28.53±2.56) kg/m], stone burden (37.68±6.89) mm . (35.53±6.52) mm, number of calyces involved 2.72±0.68 . 2.86±0.71, presence of hydronephrosis (56.0% . 46.4%), total operative time (93.0±12.2) min . (96.8±14.2) min, hemoglobin level reduction (6.56±2.16) g/L . 97.54±2.64) g/L, stone-free rate (92.0% . 92.8%), hospital stay (5.52±0.59) d . (5.64±0.62) d, perioperative complication rate (8.0% . 7.2%). Two patients in EUGA group experienced perioperative complications (one urinary tract infection and one hematuria) while two patients in UGA group experienced perioperative urinary tract infection. None in both groups received blood transfusion. The patients undergoing EUGA had shorter renal access time [(4.0±0.7) min . (6.8±2.6) min, < 0.01] and less repeat puncture (0 . 4 cases, < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

EUGA is an optimal technique to establish percutaneous renal access in ECIRS, which minimizes access time and repeated procedures.

摘要

目的

比较内镜联合超声引导穿刺(EUGA)与传统超声引导穿刺(UGA)在经皮肾镜联合腔内手术(ECIRS)中建立经皮肾穿刺通道的效果。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年10月期间53例行ECIRS治疗上尿路结石的患者。所有病例均为直径大于2 cm的复杂性上尿路结石。复杂的结石情况,如多个肾盏结石或鹿角形结石需要行ECIRS。在全身麻醉下,患者取改良仰卧瓦尔迪维亚(GMSV)体位,以便进行顺行和逆行穿刺。根据建立经皮肾穿刺通道的方案将患者分为UGA组和EUGA组。28例采用内镜联合超声引导穿刺。在可弯曲输尿管镜直视下进行穿刺和扩张,25例采用传统超声引导技术进行经皮肾穿刺。比较人口统计学和围手术期信息,如结石负荷、肾积水情况和受累肾盏数量。主要结局指标包括总手术时间、肾穿刺时间、重复穿刺次数、血红蛋白水平、围手术期并发症和结石清除率。

结果

53例ECRIS患者均未发生术中严重并发症。两组患者在年龄和性别上无显著差异。体重指数[BMI(29.21±3.14)kg/m².(28.53±2.56)kg/m²]、结石负荷(37.68±6.89)mm².(35.53±6.52)mm²、受累肾盏数量2.72±0.68.2.86±0.71、肾积水情况(56.0%.46.4%)、总手术时间(93.0±12.2)min.(96.8±14.2)min、血红蛋白水平下降(6.56±2.16)g/L.(7.54±2.64)g/L、结石清除率(92.0%.92.8%)、住院时间(5.52±0.59)d.(5.64±0.62)d、围手术期并发症发生率(8.0%.7.2%)方面均无显著差异。EUGA组有2例患者发生围手术期并发症(1例尿路感染和1例血尿),UGA组有2例患者发生围手术期尿路感染。两组均无患者接受输血。接受EUGA的患者肾穿刺时间更短[(4.0±0.7)min.(6.8±2.6)min,P<0.01],重复穿刺次数更少(0.4例,P<0.05)。

结论

EUGA是ECIRS中建立经皮肾穿刺通道的最佳技术,可将穿刺时间和重复操作降至最低。

相似文献

1
[Endoscopic combined ultrasound-guided access ultrasound-guided access in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery].[内镜联合超声引导穿刺:内镜联合肾内手术中的超声引导穿刺]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Aug 18;52(4):692-696. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.018.
2
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜下内镜联合肾内手术治疗部分鹿角形结石的随机对照试验
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: a single-centre experience.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术与多通道微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的比较:单中心经验。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01030-7.
4
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy?加尔达考改良仰卧瓦尔迪维亚体位下的内镜联合肾内手术:经皮肾镜取石术的新标准?
Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1393-403. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.073. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
5
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for Simultaneous Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Study.内镜联合肾内手术治疗同时性肾输尿管结石:一项回顾性研究
J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1056-1061. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0329. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
6
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Combined Antegrade Flexible Ureteroscope for Complete Staghorn Stones: A Case Report of a New Concept of Stone Surgery.经皮肾镜碎石术联合顺行软性输尿管镜治疗完全鹿角形结石:结石手术新概念的 1 例报告。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 23;59(1):35. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010035.
7
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position versus Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position for the management of partial staghorn calculi.经皮肾镜取石术在俯卧分腿位与改良后 Galdakao 仰卧位(Valdivia 位)治疗鹿角状肾结石的对比研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01115-3.
8
A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective single-center study.经皮肾镜取石术与改良斜仰卧位下经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的对比研究:一项回顾性单中心研究
Urolithiasis. 2021 Apr;49(2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01207-5. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
9
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy.内镜联合肾内手术治疗大结石:软性输尿管镜与微通道经皮肾镜碎石术的同期应用克服了经皮肾镜碎石术单一治疗的弊端。
J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):28-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0361. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
10
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Advantages and limitations.超声引导经皮肾镜取石术:优势与局限性。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Sep;58(5):346-352. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.346. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
2
Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Treating 20-40 mm Renal Stones.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗20 - 40毫米肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2017 Mar 16;14(2):2995-2999.
3
Feasibility of single-session endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for ipsilateral large renal stones and retrograde intrarenal surgery for contralateral renal stones: Initial experience.一期内镜联合肾内手术治疗同侧大肾结石及逆行肾内手术治疗对侧肾结石的可行性:初步经验
Int J Urol. 2017 May;24(5):377-382. doi: 10.1111/iju.13313. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study.中国肾结石的患病率:一项基于超声检查的横断面研究。
BJU Int. 2017 Jul;120(1):109-116. doi: 10.1111/bju.13828. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
5
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Postpercutaneous Nephrolithotomy Residual Stones.内镜联合肾内手术治疗经皮肾镜取石术后残余结石
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Dec 5;129(23):2885-2887. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.194659.
6
Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.结石的外科治疗:美国泌尿外科学会/腔内泌尿外科学会指南,第二部分。
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜下内镜联合肾内手术治疗部分鹿角形结石的随机对照试验
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
8
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
9
Ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy: a new technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).输尿管镜辅助逆行肾造口术:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的新方法。
BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(4):588-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10795.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
10
The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.《内镜泌尿外科协会经皮肾镜取石术全球研究临床研究办公室:5803 例患者的适应证、并发症和结局》。
J Endourol. 2011 Jan;25(1):11-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424.