Fiorillo Andrea, Barlati Stefano, Bellomo Antonello, Corrivetti Giulio, Nicolò Giuseppe, Sampogna Gaia, Stanga Valentina, Veltro Franco, Maina Giuseppe, Vita Antonio
Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli, Largo Madonna delle Grazie, Naples, Italy.
Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 5;19:43. doi: 10.1186/s12991-020-00293-4. eCollection 2020.
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process in which the doctor provides clear and complete medical information to patients about their treatment, and patients provide information on his/her preferences. Patients and clinicians bring different, but equally important, knowledge to the decision-making process. Through the adoption of SDM, it should be possible to overcome the barriers that hinder the acceptance of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) by patients, and often also by psychiatrists. The present paper is a critical appraisal of recent literature on the impact of SDM in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments and in implementing the use of LAIs in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. SDM is recognized as a promising strategy to improve collaboration between clinicians and patients in achieving recovery. When considering drug treatments, clinicians must evaluate the patient's preferences, expectations and concerns towards the development of a personalized treatment strategy. Moreover, an active involvement in the decision process could reduce the patient's perception of being coerced into the use of LAIs. Involving patients in the choice of therapy is not sufficient to increase pharmacological adherence if, at the same time, there is no constant work of comparison and communication with the reference psychiatric team. SDM can be particularly effective for LAI prescription, since patient can have prejudices and unjustified fears related to the LAI formulation, which the doctor must resolve.
共同决策(SDM)是一个过程,在此过程中医生向患者提供关于其治疗的清晰且完整的医学信息,患者则提供有关其偏好的信息。患者和临床医生在决策过程中带来不同但同样重要的知识。通过采用共同决策,应该能够克服阻碍患者(通常还有精神科医生)接受长效注射用抗精神病药物(LAIs)的障碍。本文是对近期文献的批判性评估,这些文献探讨了共同决策在提高药物治疗依从性以及在精神分裂症患者治疗中实施长效注射用抗精神病药物使用方面的影响。共同决策被认为是一种有前景的策略,可改善临床医生与患者之间在实现康复方面的协作。在考虑药物治疗时,临床医生必须评估患者对制定个性化治疗策略的偏好、期望和担忧。此外,积极参与决策过程可以减少患者被强迫使用长效注射用抗精神病药物的感觉。如果同时没有与参考精神科团队进行持续的比较和沟通工作,让患者参与治疗选择不足以提高药物治疗依从性。共同决策对于长效注射用抗精神病药物的处方可能特别有效,因为患者可能对长效注射用抗精神病药物剂型存在偏见和不合理的恐惧,医生必须消除这些恐惧。