Nobematsu Ayumi, Takahashi Kayoko
Sensory and Motor Control, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health Science, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
Prog Rehabil Med. 2020 Jun 27;5:20200013. doi: 10.2490/prm.20200013. eCollection 2020.
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices are crucial for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients because disease progression impairs verbal speech. Although the introduction of AAC devices must be appropriately timed, no guidelines currently exist. In this study, we examined the usefulness of the ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) for predicting the timing of device introduction.
This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study with consecutive sampling of patients diagnosed with ALS who underwent rehabilitation at Kitasato University East Hospital between 2011 and 2018. Patients were introduced to AAC devices (writing, communication boards, switch control, and/or eye control) and underwent assessment at three timepoints: the start of rehabilitation, as each communication device was introduced, and at the end of rehabilitation. ALSFRS-R multiple comparisons were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and, as a post-test, the Steel-Dwass test was used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) based on ALSFRS-R total and sub-item scores were used to calculate cut-off values for when transitioning to a new type of device is necessary.
In this study, 216 patients underwent rehabilitation, and 92 met the inclusion criteria. The total ALSFRS-R scores significantly differed among the four devices, except for those between communication boards and switch control devices. The bulbar and respiratory sub-scores did not significantly differ between devices. For each device type, total or sub-item scores yielded an AUC of 0.8 or more.
Our findings suggest that the ALSFRS-R is a useful assessment for timing the introduction of communication devices, and its utilization could help therapists, caregivers, and families to provide AAC for patients with ALS.
辅助和替代沟通(AAC)设备对肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者至关重要,因为疾病进展会损害言语表达。尽管必须适时引入AAC设备,但目前尚无相关指南。在本研究中,我们检验了修订版ALS功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)在预测设备引入时机方面的效用。
本研究为回顾性横断面研究,连续抽取2011年至2018年期间在北里大学东医院接受康复治疗的ALS确诊患者。患者被引入AAC设备(书写、沟通板、开关控制和/或眼控),并在三个时间点接受评估:康复开始时、每种沟通设备引入时以及康复结束时。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析ALSFRS-R的多重比较,并在事后检验中使用Steel-Dwass检验。基于ALSFRS-R总分和子项目得分的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线及ROC曲线下面积(AUC)用于计算何时有必要过渡到新型设备的临界值。
本研究中,216例患者接受了康复治疗,92例符合纳入标准。除沟通板和开关控制设备之间外,四种设备的ALSFRS-R总分存在显著差异。各设备之间的延髓和呼吸子得分无显著差异。对于每种设备类型,总分或子项目得分的AUC均为0.8或更高。
我们的研究结果表明,ALSFRS-R在确定沟通设备引入时机方面是一种有用的评估工具,其应用有助于治疗师、护理人员和家属为ALS患者提供AAC。