Department of Engineering Systems and Environment, University of Virginia, 351 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22904, United States.
Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, 291 McCormick Rd., Charlottesville, VA 22904, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 10;747:141281. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141281. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
Strategies to mitigate watershed nitrogen export are critical in managing water resources. Green infrastructure (GI) has shown the ability to remove nitrogen from stormwater, but the removal mechanism is unclear. Denitrification removes nitrate from water permanently, making it the most desirable removal mechanism. The year-round field performance of a roadside infiltration GI practice (bioretention) in Northern Virginia was monitored to investigate the transport of nitrogen and the occurrence and contribution of denitrification. Stormwater runoff volumes, nitrogen concentrations, and nitrate isotope ratios (δN-NO and δO-NO) were measured at the inlet and outlet of the bioretention during 24 storm events over 14 months. Nitrate concentration reductions (inlet vs. outlet) displayed seasonal trends, with higher reductions happening during warmer events and lower reductions or increases occurring during colder events. Cumulative bioretention nitrate and total dissolved nitrogen load reductions were 73% and 70%, respectively. Two out of 24 monitored events displayed denitrification isotope trends, indicating that although bioretention has denitrification potential, it is infrequent and other nitrogen removal mechanisms (i.e. infiltration and plant uptake) are primarily responsible for nitrogen surface effluent reductions. Only approximately 1.4% of the total reduced nitrate surface effluent load over the monitoring period was attributable to denitrification. Denitrification occurred during two of the largest monitored events, suggesting increased hydraulic retention time (HRT) promotes denitrification. Future GI designs should consider increasing HRT to encourage the important ecosystem service denitrification provides.
减轻流域氮素输出的策略对于水资源管理至关重要。绿色基础设施(GI)已显示出从雨水去除氮的能力,但去除机制尚不清楚。反硝化作用将硝酸盐从水中永久去除,使其成为最理想的去除机制。本研究对弗吉尼亚北部路边渗透 GI 实践(生物滞留)的全年野外性能进行了监测,以调查氮的迁移以及反硝化的发生和贡献。在 14 个月的 24 次暴雨事件中,在生物滞留的入口和出口处测量了径流量、氮浓度和硝酸盐同位素比值(δN-NO 和 δO-NO)。硝酸盐浓度降低(入口与出口)呈现季节性趋势,在较温暖的事件中降低幅度较大,在较寒冷的事件中降低幅度较小或增加。生物滞留的硝酸盐和总溶解氮负荷累积减少率分别为 73%和 70%。24 次监测事件中有两次显示出反硝化同位素趋势,表明尽管生物滞留具有反硝化潜力,但发生频率较低,其他氮去除机制(即渗透和植物吸收)是氮表面流出物减少的主要原因。在监测期间,仅有约 1.4%的总还原硝酸盐表面流出物负荷归因于反硝化。反硝化发生在两次最大规模的监测事件中,这表明增加水力停留时间(HRT)可以促进反硝化。未来的 GI 设计应考虑增加 HRT 以鼓励反硝化提供的重要生态系统服务。