After the Randomized Trial: Implementation of Community-Based Continence Promotion in the Real World.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Most women aged 65 and older have incontinence, associated with high healthcare costs, institutionalization, and negative quality of life, but few seek care. Mind over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (MOM) is a small-group self-management workshop, led by a trained facilitator in a community setting, proven to improve incontinence in older women.

DESIGN

We used mixed methods to gather information on the real-world adoption, maintenance, and implementation of MOM by community agencies following a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that tested intervention effects on incontinence.

SETTING

Community agencies serving older adults in six Wisconsin communities.

PARTICIPANTS

Community agency administrators and facilitators trained to offer MOM for the RCT.

MEASUREMENTS

Investigators tracked rates of adoption (offering MOM in the 12 months following the RCT) and maintenance (offering MOM more than once in the next 18 months) in six communities. Individual interviews and focus groups (N = 17) generated qualitative data about barriers and facilitators related to adoption and maintenance. Trained observers assessed implementation fidelity (alignment with program protocol) at 42 MOM sessions.

RESULTS

A total of 67% of communities (four of six) adopted MOM, and 50% (three of six) maintained MOM. No implementation fidelity lapses occurred. Facilitators of adoption and maintenance included MOM's well-organized protocol and lean time commitment, sharing of implementation efforts between partner organizations, staff specifically assigned to health promotion activities, and high community interest in continence promotion. Other than stigma associated with incontinence, barriers were similar to those seen with other community-based programs for older adults: limited funding/staffing, competing organizational priorities, challenges identifying/training facilitators, and difficulty engaging community partners/participants.

CONCLUSION

Using design for dissemination and community engagement, assessment of implementation outcomes is feasible in conjunction with a clinical RCT. Partner-centered implementation packages can address barriers to adoption and maintenance.