Niles Denver T, Wijetunge Dona S S, Palazzi Debra L, Singh Ila R, Revell Paula A
Infectious Disease Section, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00794-20.
Plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a new diagnostic method used to potentially identify multiple pathogens with a single DNA-based diagnostic test. The test is expensive, and little is understood about where it fits into the diagnostic schema. We describe our experience at Texas Children's Hospital with the mNGS assay by Karius from Redwood City, CA, to determine whether mNGS offers additional diagnostic value when performed within 1 week before or after conventional testing (CT) (i.e., concurrently). We performed a retrospective review of all patients who had mNGS testing from April to June of 2019. Results for mNGS testing, collection time, time of result entry into the electronic medical record, and turnaround time were compared to those for CT performed concurrently. Discordant results were further reviewed for changes in antimicrobials due to the additional organism(s) identified by mNGS. Sixty patients had mNGS testing; the majority were immunosuppressed (62%). There was 61% positive agreement and 58% negative agreement between mNGS and CT. The mean time of result entry into the electronic medical record for CT was 3.5 days earlier than the mean result time for mNGS. When an additional organism(s) was identified by mNGS, antimicrobials were changed 26% of the time. On average, CT provided the same result as mNGS, but sooner than mNGS. When additional organisms were identified by mNGS, there was no change in management in the majority of cases. Overall, mNGS added little diagnostic value when ordered concurrently with CT.
血浆宏基因组新一代测序(mNGS)是一种新型诊断方法,可通过基于DNA的单一诊断测试潜在地识别多种病原体。该测试成本高昂,对于其在诊断体系中的定位了解甚少。我们描述了德克萨斯儿童医院使用加利福尼亚州红木城Karius公司的mNGS检测方法的经验,以确定在传统检测(CT)前或后1周内(即同时进行)进行mNGS检测时是否能提供额外的诊断价值。我们对2019年4月至6月期间所有进行mNGS检测的患者进行了回顾性研究。将mNGS检测结果、采集时间、结果录入电子病历的时间以及周转时间与同时进行的CT检测结果进行了比较。对于因mNGS检测出的额外病原体而导致的抗菌药物变化,对不一致的结果进行了进一步审查。60例患者进行了mNGS检测;大多数患者免疫功能低下(62%)。mNGS与CT之间的阳性一致性为61%,阴性一致性为58%。CT结果录入电子病历的平均时间比mNGS的平均结果时间早3.5天。当mNGS检测出额外病原体时,26%的情况下会更换抗菌药物。平均而言,CT与mNGS的结果相同,但比mNGS更快。当mNGS检测出额外病原体时,大多数情况下管理并无变化。总体而言,与CT同时进行检测时,mNGS几乎没有增加诊断价值。