Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Dec;26(12):2217-2222. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
A paucity of randomized phase III clinical trials in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has resulted in no uniform consensus on the optimal strategy for consolidation and conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The past 2 decades have witnessed a preference for thiotepa (TT)-based conditioning regimens due to superior central nervous system penetration. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients with PCNSL who underwent ASCT at Mayo Clinic, Rochester over the past 2 decades, and the impact of TT-based conditioning regimens. Fifty-six patients underwent transplant for PCNSL, with 25 and 31 patients receiving BEAM (non-thiotepa) and carmustine (BCNU)/TT-based conditioning, respectively. All patients received high-dose methotrexate-based induction therapy. While the BCNU/TT group had higher risk disease features such as high International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group prognostic score, elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein, and older patient population, there was no significant difference at 2 years post-transplant in progression-free survival (BEAM 68.0% [46.1% to 82.5%] versus BCNU/TT, 65.5% [45.2% to 79.8%], P = .99) or overall survival (OS) (84.0% [62.8% to 93.7%] in the BEAM group versus 81.6% [61.3% to 91.9%] in the BCNU/TT group, P = .95). Disease response status before transplant significantly affected the outcomes as those in complete remission had an OS at 2 years post-transplant of 94.7% (68.1% to 99.2%) in the BEAM group and 90.5% (67.0% to 97.5%) in the BCNU/TT group compared with those in partial response, 57.1% (17.2% to 83.7%) in BCNU/TT group and 50.0% (11.1% to 80.4%) in the BEAM group, respectively (P < .0001). Our retrospective cohort adds to the currently available literature and identifies the disease status before transplant as a significant factor affecting survival.
原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)缺乏随机 III 期临床试验,导致对于自体干细胞移植(ASCT)后的巩固和预处理方案没有统一的共识。在过去的 20 年中,由于更好的中枢神经系统穿透性,人们更倾向于使用噻替派(TT)为基础的预处理方案。我们回顾性评估了过去 20 年在梅奥诊所罗切斯特院区接受 ASCT 的 PCNSL 患者的结果,并分析了 TT 为基础的预处理方案的影响。56 例患者接受了 PCNSL 的移植治疗,其中 25 例和 31 例患者分别接受了 BEAM(非噻替派)和卡莫司汀(BCNU)/TT 为基础的预处理。所有患者均接受了高剂量甲氨蝶呤为基础的诱导治疗。虽然 BCNU/TT 组具有更高危的疾病特征,如国际结外淋巴瘤研究组预后评分较高、脑脊液蛋白升高和患者年龄较大,但在移植后 2 年时,无进展生存率(BEAM 为 68.0%[46.1%至 82.5%]与 BCNU/TT 为 65.5%[45.2%至 79.8%],P=0.99)或总生存率(OS)(BEAM 组为 84.0%[62.8%至 93.7%]与 BCNU/TT 组为 81.6%[61.3%至 91.9%],P=0.95)并无显著差异。移植前疾病反应状态显著影响了结果,因为完全缓解患者在 BEAM 组的移植后 2 年 OS 为 94.7%(68.1%至 99.2%),而在 BCNU/TT 组为 90.5%(67.0%至 97.5%),与部分缓解患者相比,BCNU/TT 组为 57.1%(17.2%至 83.7%),BEAM 组为 50.0%(11.1%至 80.4%)(P<0.0001)。我们的回顾性队列增加了目前可用的文献,并确定了移植前的疾病状态是影响生存的一个重要因素。