Mossaad Nadwa, Ferwerda Jeremy, Lawrence Duncan, Weinstein Jeremy, Hainmueller Jens
Office of Immigration Statistics, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, 20528, USA.
Immigration Policy Lab, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Sci Adv. 2020 Aug 7;6(32):eabb0295. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb0295. eCollection 2020 Aug.
At a time of heightened anxiety surrounding immigration, state governments have increasingly sought to manage immigrant and refugee flows. Yet the factors that influence where immigrants choose to settle after arrival remain unclear. We bring evidence to this question by analyzing population-level data for refugees resettled within the United States. Unlike other immigrants, refugees are assigned to initial locations across the country but are free to relocate and select another residence after arrival. Drawing on individual-level administrative data for adult refugees resettled between 2000 and 2014 ( = 447,747), we examine the relative desirability of locations by examining how retention rates and patterns of secondary migration differ across states. We find no discernible evidence that refugees' locational choices are strongly influenced by state partisanship or the generosity of welfare benefits. Instead, we find that refugees prioritize locations with employment opportunities and existing co-national networks.
在围绕移民问题的焦虑情绪日益加剧之际,州政府越来越多地寻求管理移民和难民流动。然而,移民抵达后选择定居地点的影响因素仍不明确。我们通过分析在美国重新安置的难民的人口层面数据来回答这个问题。与其他移民不同,难民被分配到美国各地的初始安置地点,但抵达后可以自由迁移并选择其他住所。利用2000年至2014年间重新安置的成年难民(=447,747)的个人层面行政数据,我们通过考察不同州的留存率和二次迁移模式的差异,来研究各地点的相对吸引力。我们没有发现明显证据表明难民的选址选择受到州党派倾向或福利慷慨程度的强烈影响。相反,我们发现难民将有就业机会和现有同胞网络的地点列为优先选择。