Suppr超能文献

精液中外泌体分离方法对下游 miRNA 分析的影响:一项比较研究。

Impact of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods on Downstream Mirna Analysis in Semen: A Comparative Study.

机构信息

Human Molecular Genetics Group-Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08908 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Translational Medical Oncology Group (Oncomet), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 19;21(17):5949. doi: 10.3390/ijms21175949.

Abstract

Seminal plasma (SP) contains a unique concentration of miRNA, mostly contained in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) such as exosomes, some of which could be clinically useful for diagnosis and/or prognosis of urogenital diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa). We optimized several exosome-EV isolation technologies for their use in semen, evaluating EV purifying effectiveness and impact on the downstream analysis of miRNAs against results from the standard ultracentrifugation (UC) method to implement the use of SP sEV_miRNAs as noninvasive biomarkers for PCa. Our results evidenced that commercial kits designed to isolate exosomes/EVs from blood or urine are mostly applicable to SP, but showed quantitative and qualitative variability between them. and the × methods resulted as equivalent alternative procedures to for isolating exosomes/sEVs from semen for nanoparticle characteristics and quality of RNA contained in vesicles. Additionally, the expression profile of the altered semen sEV-miRNAs in PCa varies depending on the EV isolation method applied. This is possibly due to different extraction techniques yielding different proportions of sEV subtypes. This is evidence that the exosome-EV isolation method has a significant impact on the analysis of the miRNAs contained within, with important consequences for their use as clinical biomarkers. Therefore, miRNA analysis results for EVs cannot be directly extrapolated between different EV isolation methods until clear markers for delineation between microvesicles and exosomes are established. However, EV extraction methodology affects combined models (semen exosome miRNA signatures plus blood Prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration for PCa diagnosis) less; specifically our previously described (miR-142-3p + miR-142-5p + miR-223-3p + PSA) model functions as molecular marker from EVs from any of the three isolation methods, potentially improving the efficiency of PSA PCa diagnosis.

摘要

精浆 (SP) 中含有独特浓度的 miRNA,主要包含在小细胞外囊泡 (sEVs) 中,如外泌体,其中一些可能对诊断和/或预后泌尿生殖系统疾病(如前列腺癌 (PCa))具有临床意义。我们优化了几种外泌体-EV 分离技术,用于精液,评估 EV 纯化效果,并对 miRNA 的下游分析产生影响,与标准超速离心 (UC) 方法的结果相比,以实施 SP sEV_miRNAs 作为非侵入性生物标志物用于 PCa。我们的结果表明,专门用于从血液或尿液中分离外泌体/ EV 的商业试剂盒大多适用于 SP,但它们之间存在定量和定性差异。 和 方法是分离精液中外泌体/sEV 的等效替代方法,用于纳米颗粒特征和囊泡中 RNA 的质量。此外,PCa 中改变的精液 sEV-miRNA 的表达谱取决于所应用的 EV 分离方法。这可能是由于不同的提取技术产生不同比例的 sEV 亚型。这表明外泌体-EV 分离方法对其中包含的 miRNA 分析有重大影响,对其作为临床生物标志物的应用具有重要意义。因此,在明确区分微泡和外泌体的标记物建立之前,不能直接将 EV 分离方法之间的 miRNA 分析结果推断。然而,EV 提取方法学对联合模型(精液外泌体 miRNA 特征加上血液前列腺特异性抗原 (PSA) 浓度用于 PCa 诊断)的影响较小;具体来说,我们之前描述的(miR-142-3p + miR-142-5p + miR-223-3p + PSA)模型从三种分离方法中的任何一种的 EV 作为分子标志物起作用,有可能提高 PSA PCa 诊断的效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac4/7504614/1cd25aa03ab8/ijms-21-05949-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验