Thomas Hannah J, Marsh Channa E, Maslen Barbara A, Scurrah Katrina J, Naylor Louise H, Green Daniel J
School of Human Sciences, Exercise and Sport Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, AUSTRALIA.
Twins Research Australia, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Jan;53(1):58-67. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002461.
We studied individual variability in exercise responses in twins. We hypothesized that 1) endurance (END) training would reduce fat mass whereas resistance (RES) training would increase lean mass, 2) individuals who did not respond to one modality would respond to the other, and 3) cross-sectional heritability estimates would be higher than estimates based on training responses.
DXA was undertaken in 84 same-sex untrained twins (30 monozygotic [MZ], 12 dizygotic [DZ]). Participants underwent 3 months of END and RES training, separated by 3 months washout. Twins trained in pairs.
RES (P < 0.001) and END (P = 0.002) increased lean mass, with a greater change in RES (P < 0.001). Similarly, RES (P = 0.04) and END (P = 0.006) decreased fat mass. Eighty-four percent of subjects responded positively to RES for lean mass and 58% to END (P < 0.001). For fat mass, RES and END induced 56% and 66% responder rates, respectively (P = 0.28). Cross-sectional intraclass correlations, used to assess the similarity in twin responses, were higher for MZ than DZ pairs for all variables. Following training, only MZ pairs were significantly correlated (P < 0.001) for change in lean mass to RES.
To our knowledge, this study is the first to report individual responsiveness in body composition to both RES and END in the same subjects. Although RES and END induced favorable changes in fat mass, RES was superior for lean mass. The frequency of lean mass responders to RES exceeded that for END, whereas response rates for fat mass were similar. Cross-sectional heritability estimates were higher than training response estimates, and shared environment had the largest influence on changes in body composition. This study suggests that exercise professionals should consider modality and environmental factors when optimizing exercise interventions.
我们研究了双胞胎运动反应的个体差异。我们假设:1)耐力(END)训练会减少脂肪量,而抗阻(RES)训练会增加瘦体重;2)对一种训练方式无反应的个体对另一种训练方式会有反应;3)横断面遗传力估计值会高于基于训练反应的估计值。
对84对同性未受过训练的双胞胎(30对同卵双胞胎[MZ],12对异卵双胞胎[DZ])进行了双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量。参与者接受了3个月的END和RES训练,中间间隔3个月的洗脱期。双胞胎成对进行训练。
RES(P<0.001)和END(P = 0.002)均增加了瘦体重,RES的变化更大(P<0.001)。同样,RES(P = 0.04)和END(P = 0.006)均减少了脂肪量。84%的受试者对RES增加瘦体重呈阳性反应,58%对END呈阳性反应(P<0.001)。对于脂肪量,RES和END的反应率分别为56%和66%(P = 0.28)。用于评估双胞胎反应相似性的横断面组内相关系数,在所有变量上MZ对均高于DZ对。训练后,只有MZ对在RES增加瘦体重方面存在显著相关性(P<0.001)。
据我们所知,本研究首次报告了同一受试者对RES和END两种训练方式在身体成分方面的个体反应性。虽然RES和END均对脂肪量产生了有利变化,但RES在增加瘦体重方面更具优势。对RES增加瘦体重有反应的频率超过了END,而脂肪量的反应率相似。横断面遗传力估计值高于训练反应估计值,共同环境对身体成分变化的影响最大。本研究表明,运动专业人员在优化运动干预时应考虑训练方式和环境因素。