Simon R D, Peacock A M
J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;30(7):626-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.30.7.626.
A comparison is made between the automated reagin test (ART) using Technicon AutoAnalyzer equipment and the reagin screen test (RST) introduced by Lederle using a new antigen formulation. Treponemal haemagglutination tests (TPHA) were done simultaneously as second screen tests. The absorbed fluorescent treponemal antibody test (FTA-ABS) was used in all seropositive cases. Altogether 1154 sera were tested; 1028 were negative with all tests, 66 were positive with all tests, 42 were positive with TPHA and negative with ART and RST, and 16 were positive with TPHA and RST and negative with ART. It was concluded that the use of the RST and TPHA together would be the more sensitive screen test.
对使用Technicon自动分析仪设备进行的自动反应素试验(ART)与Lederle公司采用新抗原制剂推出的反应素筛查试验(RST)进行了比较。同时进行梅毒螺旋体血细胞凝集试验(TPHA)作为二次筛查试验。所有血清学阳性病例均采用吸收荧光梅毒螺旋体抗体试验(FTA-ABS)。共检测了1154份血清;1028份所有试验均为阴性,66份所有试验均为阳性,42份TPHA阳性而ART和RST阴性,16份TPHA和RST阳性而ART阴性。得出的结论是,联合使用RST和TPHA将是更敏感的筛查试验。