Médecine Intensive Et Réanimation (Département R3S), Service de Pneumologie, AP-HP, Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, 75013, Paris, France.
UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale Et Clinique, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, 75005, Paris, France.
J Neurol. 2021 Feb;268(2):516-525. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10191-0. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
Only limited data are available regarding the long-term prognosis of patients with high-grade glioma discharged alive from the intensive care unit. We sought to quantify 1-year mortality and evaluate the association between mortality and (1) functional status, and (2) management of anticancer therapy in patients with high-grade glioma discharged alive from the intensive care unit.
Retrospective observational cohort study of patients with high-grade glioma admitted to two intensive care units between January 2009 and June 2018. Functional status was assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status. Anticancer therapy after discharge was classified as (1) continued (unchanged), (2) modified (changed or stopped), or (3) initiated (for newly diagnosed disease).
Ninety-one high-grade glioma patients (73% of whom had glioblastoma) were included and 78 (86%) of these patients were discharged alive from the intensive care unit. Anticancer therapy was continued, modified, and initiated in 41%, 42%, and 17% of patients, respectively. Corticosteroid therapy at the time of ICU admission [odds ratio (OR) 0.07] and cancer progression (OR 0.09) was independently associated with continuation of anticancer therapy. The mortality rate 1 year after ICU admission was 73%. On multivariate analysis, continuation of anticancer therapy (OR 0.18) and Karnofsky performance status on admission (OR 0.90) were independently associated with lower 1-year mortality.
The presence of high-grade glioma is not sufficient to justify refusal of intensive care unit admission. Performance status and continuation of anticancer therapy are associated with higher survival after intensive care unit discharge.
Preliminary results were presented at the most recent congress of the French Intensive Care Society, Paris, 2019.
仅有有限的数据可用于评估从重症监护病房存活出院的高级别脑胶质瘤患者的长期预后。我们旨在量化患者的 1 年死亡率,并评估死亡率与(1)功能状态,以及(2)重症监护病房存活出院的高级别脑胶质瘤患者的抗癌治疗管理之间的关系。
这是一项回顾性观察性队列研究,纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间在两个重症监护病房收治的高级别脑胶质瘤患者。功能状态通过卡氏行为状态量表(Karnofsky Performance Status)进行评估。出院后的抗癌治疗分为(1)持续(不变),(2)修改(改变或停止),或(3)开始(用于新诊断的疾病)。
共纳入 91 名高级别脑胶质瘤患者(其中 73%为胶质母细胞瘤),其中 78 名(86%)患者从重症监护病房存活出院。分别有 41%、42%和 17%的患者持续、修改和开始接受抗癌治疗。重症监护病房入院时使用皮质类固醇治疗[比值比(OR)0.07]和癌症进展(OR 0.09)与抗癌治疗的持续使用独立相关。重症监护病房入院后 1 年的死亡率为 73%。多变量分析显示,抗癌治疗的持续(OR 0.18)和入院时的卡氏行为状态(OR 0.90)与较低的 1 年死亡率独立相关。
高级别脑胶质瘤的存在并不足以成为拒绝重症监护病房收治的理由。入院时的功能状态和抗癌治疗的持续使用与重症监护病房出院后的生存相关。
初步结果在最近于巴黎举行的法国重症监护学会大会上进行了报告。