Piñero David P, de Fez Dolores, Cabezos Inmaculada, López-Navarro Alberto, Caballero María T, Camps Vicente J
Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Crta San Vicente del Raspeig s/n 03016, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
Optometry Clinic, Prevention Service of the University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01625-4.
The measurement of the pupillary function is an indispensable test in some eye examinations, being necessary the evaluation of the precision of instruments performing such measures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intrasession repeatability of pupil size measurements provided by a multidiagnostic platform in a large sample of healthy eyes.
This prospective study enrolled 100 healthy eyes of 100 patients, with ages ranging from 23 to 65 years old. Repeated pupil size measures under photopic (P, 220 lx), mesopic (M, 160 lx), low mesopic (L, 70 lx), and scotopic conditions (S, 1 lx) were obtained with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies, Chartres, France) after a complete eye exam. Likewise, pupil size was also measured once in the fellow eye in a total of 75 eyes. The level of intrasession variability as well as differences between fellow eyes were evaluated.
Most of differences between repeated measures did not exceed 0.5 mm (82% of S and 100% of P below this value). No significant differences between these repeated measures were found for S (p = 0.099) and L (p = 0.751). However, statistically significant differences were found between repeated measures for M (p = 0.002) and P (p = 0.003). The analysis of clinical relevance of differences between pairs (Passing-Bablok) only confirmed the clinical relevance of differences between the first and second repeated measurement of M. Concerning the comparative analysis between fellow eyes, no statistically significant differences in pupil size were found between right and left eyes in any light condition evaluated (p ≥ 0.227).
The VX120 system can provide consistent measurements of pupil size under scotopic, low mesopic and photopic conditions, with a relative limitation under mesopic conditions.
瞳孔功能测量是一些眼科检查中不可或缺的一项检测,因此评估执行此类测量的仪器的精度很有必要。本研究的目的是在大量健康眼睛样本中评估多诊断平台提供的瞳孔大小测量的日内重复性。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了100例患者的100只健康眼睛,年龄在23至65岁之间。在进行全面眼科检查后,使用VX120系统(法国沙特尔市Visionix-Luneau Technologies公司)在明视(P,220勒克斯)、中间视觉(M,160勒克斯)、低中间视觉(L,70勒克斯)和暗视条件(S,1勒克斯)下重复测量瞳孔大小。同样,在总共75只眼睛的对侧眼中也测量了一次瞳孔大小。评估了日内变异性水平以及对侧眼之间的差异。
重复测量之间的大多数差异不超过0.5毫米(S的82%和P的100%低于此值)。对于S(p = 0.099)和L(p = 0.751),这些重复测量之间未发现显著差异。然而,对于M(p = 0.002)和P(p = 0.003),重复测量之间发现了统计学上的显著差异。对成对差异的临床相关性分析(Passing-Bablok法)仅证实了M的第一次和第二次重复测量之间差异的临床相关性。关于对侧眼之间的比较分析,在任何评估的光照条件下,右眼和左眼之间的瞳孔大小均未发现统计学上的显著差异(p≥0.227)。
VX120系统在暗视、低中间视觉和明视条件下能够提供一致的瞳孔大小测量结果,在中间视觉条件下存在相对局限性。