Suppr超能文献

《Hygia时间疗法试验中基于动态血压的纳入标准》。对莱默和米德克的反驳。

Ambulatory blood pressure-based inclusion criteria in the Hygia Chronotherapy Trial. Rebuttal to Lemmer and Middeke.

作者信息

Hermida Ramón C, Mojón Artemio, Fernández José R

机构信息

Bioengineering & Chronobiology Laboratories; Atlantic Research Center for Information and Communication Technologies (atlanTTic), University of Vigo , Vigo, Spain.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2020 Aug;37(8):1270-1272. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2020.1812898. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

Abstract

The purpose of this communication is to respond to the continuing invalid criticism by Lemmer and Middeke of the MAPEC and Hygia Chronotherapy Trial by emphasizing the: (i) already unambiguously reported ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)-based definition of hypertension utilized as inclusion criterion of both investigations and (ii) impact of bedtime hypertension chronotherapy on ABPM-assessed parameters and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome for participants further categorized by influential markers of CVD risk. In so doing, we call attention to apparent unethical misconduct of Lemmer and Middeke of multiple duplicated publications of the very same unfounded criticisms.

摘要

本通讯的目的是回应莱默和米德克对MAPEC和希吉亚时间疗法试验持续存在的无效批评,强调:(i) 两项研究均已明确报告将基于动态血压监测(ABPM)的高血压定义用作纳入标准,以及 (ii) 睡前高血压时间疗法对按心血管疾病(CVD)风险影响因素进一步分类的参与者的ABPM评估参数和心血管疾病(CVD)结局的影响。在此过程中,我们提请注意莱默和米德克对同一毫无根据的批评进行多次重复发表的明显不道德行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验