Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Hans Sachs Str. 6, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen, Hans-Meerwein-Straße 6, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;30(10):1503-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01627-z. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
Many interventions targeting executive function (EF) development in the preschool period, where malleability might be particularly high, have been created and evaluated. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of these interventions on (a) EFs in preschool children from the general population as well as preschool children with (symptoms of) attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and (b) ADHD and ODD symptoms in preschool children with ADHD/ODD (symptoms). Literature search yielded 35 RCTs. Risk of bias of the individual studies was assessed. A random-effects model was used. Moderator effects were tested using mixed model analyses. The overall effects on EFs were: d = 0.46 (95% CI 0.30-0.61) for working memory (WM), d = 0.30 (95% CI 0.21-0.38) for inhibitory control (IC), d = 0.33 (95% CI - 0.04 to 0.71) for reward-related IC, and d = 0.47 (95% CI 0.28-0.66) for flexibility. In children with ADHD/ODD, mean effects were d = 0.64 (95% CI 0.31-0.96) for WM and d = 0.46 (95% CI 0.07-0.84) for IC. Studies on reward-related IC and FL were lacking. Effects on ODD and ADHD symptoms were d = 0.40 (95% CI - 0.23 to 1.03) and d = 0.28 (95% CI - 0.08 to 0.64), respectively. Interventions targeting multiple EFs and using interpersonal cognitive scaffolding approaches showed large and statistically significant effects on ADHD and ODD symptoms. In preschool children of the general population and in those with ADHD/ODD (symptoms), interventions led to an improvement of EF performance. In children with ADHD and ODD, cognitive scaffolding interventions were most effective in terms of reducing ADHD and ODD symptoms. However, more well-controlled studies need to be conducted before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
许多针对学龄前儿童执行功能(EF)发展的干预措施已经被创建和评估,因为这个时期的可塑性可能特别高。我们对这些干预措施对(a)普通学龄前儿童和(b)有注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和对立违抗性障碍(ODD)症状的学龄前儿童的 EF 以及 ADHD/ODD 症状的影响进行了随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析。文献检索产生了 35 项 RCT。评估了个别研究的偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型。使用混合模型分析测试了调节效应。EF 的总体影响为:工作记忆(WM)的 d 值为 0.46(95%CI 0.30-0.61),抑制控制(IC)的 d 值为 0.30(95%CI 0.21-0.38),奖励相关的 IC 的 d 值为 0.33(95%CI -0.04 至 0.71),灵活性的 d 值为 0.47(95%CI 0.28-0.66)。在 ADHD/ODD 儿童中,WM 的平均效应为 d 值为 0.64(95%CI 0.31-0.96),IC 的平均效应为 d 值为 0.46(95%CI 0.07-0.84)。关于奖励相关 IC 和 FL 的研究则缺乏。对 ODD 和 ADHD 症状的影响分别为 d 值为 0.40(95%CI -0.23 至 1.03)和 d 值为 0.28(95%CI -0.08 至 0.64)。针对多种 EF 的干预措施和使用人际认知支架方法对 ADHD 和 ODD 症状具有显著的、统计学上的积极影响。在普通学龄前儿童和有 ADHD/ODD(症状)的儿童中,干预措施导致执行功能表现的改善。在 ADHD 和 ODD 儿童中,认知支架干预在减少 ADHD 和 ODD 症状方面最为有效。然而,在得出任何确定的结论之前,还需要进行更多的对照良好的研究。