Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan.
Med Dosim. 2021;46(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
There remains wide variation in the use of chest wall boluses for postmastectomy radiotherapy, which may result from the need for 2 treatment plans with the commonly used half-time tissue-equivalent 5-mm-thick bolus to achieve a full surface dose. To establish a bolus method requiring one treatment plan, we assessed the surface dose of a thinner daily bolus for all treatment fractions and compared it against the half-time 5-mm-thick bolus. In this basic study, we specifically investigated dosage achieved when using the following: (1) the existing bolus protocol, a half-time 5-mm-thick tissue-equivalent Clearfit bolus (Fujidenolo Inc., Aichi, JP); (2) no bolus; and (3) daily 1-, 2-, and 3-mm-thick Clearfit boluses at 4 and 6 MV photons. Dosimetric measurements were then taken in an anthropomorphic phantom to study the effect of each regimen on the surface doses, and the mean surface doses of the daily thinner boluses were compared with the existing bolus protocol by the Welch 2-sample t test. The mean surface doses for the existing bolus protocol, no bolus, and daily 1-, 2-, and 3-mm-thick boluses were 68% (range, 59% to 77%), 53% (41% to 66%), 73% (60% to 83%), 77% (66% to 87%), and 82% (75% to 91%) of the prescription dose at 4 MV, respectively; the corresponding values at 6 MV were 71% (63% to 79%), 50% (39% to 60%), 72% (56% to 83%), 81% (68% to 90%), and 89% (80 to 97%) of the prescription dose. The mean surface doses were comparable between the existing bolus protocol and the 1-mm-thick daily bolus at 4 and 6 MV. In conclusion, the mean surface dose of a 1-mm-thick bolus approximate that of a half-time 5-mm-thick bolus at 4 and 6 MV. As such, we have started a prospective clinical study on the safety and efficacy of a 1-mm-thick bolus for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
目前,在乳腺癌根治术后放疗中,胸壁填充物的使用仍存在广泛差异,这可能是因为需要制定 2 个治疗计划,才能使用常用的半时间组织等效 5 毫米厚的填充物来实现全表面剂量。为了建立一种仅需一个治疗计划的填充物方法,我们评估了所有治疗分次的更薄的日常填充物的表面剂量,并将其与半时间 5 毫米厚的填充物进行了比较。在这项基础研究中,我们特别研究了以下情况下的剂量:(1)现有的填充物方案,半时间 5 毫米厚的组织等效性 Clearfit 填充物(Fujidenolo Inc.,Aichi,JP);(2)无填充物;(3)4 和 6 MV 光子下的每日 1、2 和 3 毫米厚的 Clearfit 填充物。然后在人体模型中进行剂量测量,以研究每种方案对表面剂量的影响,并用 Welch 2 样本 t 检验比较日常较薄填充物的平均表面剂量与现有的填充物方案。现有的填充物方案、无填充物和每日 1、2 和 3 毫米厚的填充物的平均表面剂量分别为 4 MV 时处方剂量的 68%(范围为 59%至 77%)、53%(41%至 66%)、73%(60%至 83%)、77%(66%至 87%)和 82%(75%至 91%);6 MV 时的相应值分别为 71%(63%至 79%)、50%(39%至 60%)、72%(56%至 83%)、81%(68%至 90%)和 89%(80%至 97%)。在 4 和 6 MV 时,现有的填充物方案和 1 毫米厚的日常填充物的平均表面剂量相当。总之,在 4 和 6 MV 时,1 毫米厚的填充物的平均表面剂量接近半时间 5 毫米厚的填充物。因此,我们已经开始了一项关于乳腺癌根治术后放疗中使用 1 毫米厚的填充物的安全性和有效性的前瞻性临床研究。