Suppr超能文献

通过早期切除输卵管和晚期卵巢切除预防卵巢癌(PROTECTOR):一项前瞻性非随机多中心试验的方案。

Preventing Ovarian Cancer through early Excision of Tubes and late Ovarian Removal (PROTECTOR): protocol for a prospective non-randomised multi-center trial.

机构信息

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Feb;31(2):286-291. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001541. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is the 'gold standard' for preventing tubo-ovarian cancer in women at increased risk. However, when performed in pre-menopausal women, it results in premature menopause and associated detrimental health consequences. This, together with acceptance of the central role of the fallopian tube in etiopathogenesis of high-grade serous carcinoma, by far the most common type of tubo-ovarian cancer, has led to risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy being proposed as a two-step surgical alternative for pre-menopausal women declining/delaying oophorectomy.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact on sexual function of risk-reducing early salpingectomy, within a two-step, risk-reducing, early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy tubo-ovarian cancer prevention strategy in pre-menopausal women at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Risk-reducing early salpingectomy is non-inferior for sexual and endocrine function compared with controls; risk-reducing early salpingectomy is superior for sexual/endocrine function, non-inferior for quality-of-life, and equivalent in satisfaction to the standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

TRIAL DESIGN

Multi-center, observational cohort trial with three arms: risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; controls (no surgery). Consenting individuals undergo an ultrasound, serum CA125, and follicle-stimulating hormone measurements and provide information on medical history, family history, quality-of-life, sexual function, cancer worry, psychological well-being, and satisfaction/regret. Follow-up by questionnaire takes place annually for 3 years. Women receiving risk-reducing early salpingectomy can undergo delayed oophorectomy at a later date of their choosing, or definitely by the menopause.

MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria: pre-menopausal; aged >30 years; at increased risk of tubo-ovarian cancer (mutation carriers or on the basis of a strong family history); completed their family (for surgical arms).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

post-menopausal; previous bilateral salpingectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; pregnancy; previous tubal/ovarian/peritoneal malignancy; <12 months after cancer treatment; clinical suspicion of tubal/ovarian cancer at baseline.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Sexual function measured by validated questionnaires.

SAMPLE SIZE

1000 (333 per arm).

ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS

It is estimated recruitment will be completed by 2023 and results published by 2027.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN registry: 25 173 360 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25173360).

摘要

背景

降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术是预防高危女性输卵管卵巢癌的“金标准”。然而,在绝经前女性中进行该手术会导致过早绝经和相关的健康不良后果。此外,鉴于输卵管在高级别浆液性癌(迄今为止最常见的输卵管卵巢癌类型)的发病机制中的核心作用已被广泛接受,因此提出了两步式手术方案,即降低风险的早期输卵管切除术联合延迟卵巢切除术,作为绝经前拒绝/延迟卵巢切除术的女性的替代方案。

主要目标

评估在增加患输卵管卵巢癌风险的绝经前女性中,采用两步式、降低风险的早期输卵管切除术联合延迟卵巢切除术的策略进行降低风险的早期输卵管切除术对性功能的影响。

研究假设

与对照组相比,降低风险的早期输卵管切除术在性功能和内分泌功能方面非劣效;降低风险的早期输卵管切除术在性功能/内分泌功能方面更优,在生活质量方面非劣效,在满意度方面与标准降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术相当。

试验设计

这是一项多中心、观察性队列试验,分为三个组:降低风险的早期输卵管切除术联合延迟卵巢切除术;降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术;对照组(无手术)。同意的个体接受超声、血清 CA125 和卵泡刺激素测量,并提供病史、家族史、生活质量、性功能、癌症担忧、心理健康和满意度/后悔信息。通过问卷进行为期 3 年的每年一次的随访。接受降低风险的早期输卵管切除术的女性可以选择在以后的某个日期进行延迟卵巢切除术,或者在绝经时确定进行该手术。

主要纳入/排除标准:纳入标准:绝经前;年龄>30 岁;有增加患输卵管卵巢癌的风险(携带突变或基于强烈的家族史);已完成家庭生育(适用于手术组)。

排除标准

绝经后;既往双侧输卵管切除术或双侧卵巢切除术;妊娠;既往输卵管/卵巢/腹膜恶性肿瘤;癌症治疗后<12 个月;基线时临床怀疑有输卵管/卵巢癌。

主要终点

通过经过验证的问卷评估性功能。

样本量

1000 名(每组 333 名)。

预计完成入组和呈现结果的日期

预计招募工作将于 2023 年完成,并于 2027 年公布结果。

试验注册号

ISRCTN 注册处:25173360(https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN25173360)。

相似文献

6
Bilateral salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer risk reduction: A pilot study in women with BRCA1/2 mutations.
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jul;150(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.564. Epub 2018 May 4.
7
Prophylactic salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy as an alternative for BRCA mutation carriers.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):14-24. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182783c2f.
8
Systematic review of acceptability, cardiovascular, neurological, bone health and HRT outcomes following risk reducing surgery in BRCA carriers.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;65:46-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
9
Acceptability of prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy as risk-reducing surgery among BRCA mutation carriers.
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 May;133(2):283-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathogenesis of peritoneal high-grade serous carcinoma after risk-reducing surgery: a systematic review.
J Pathol Clin Res. 2025 Jul;11(4):e70037. doi: 10.1002/2056-4538.70037.
3
Prevention of Ovarian Cancer: Where are We Now and Where are We Going?
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Nov;26(11):1355-1366. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01587-6. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Utility Scores for Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Mapping to EQ-5D.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 30;16(7):1358. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071358.
6
Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer.
Med J Aust. 2024 Mar 18;220(5):264-274. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52227. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355324. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55324.
8
Current and Emerging Strategies for Tubo-Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 28;13(21):3331. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213331.
10
Insights from UKCTOCS for design, conduct and analyses of large randomised controlled trials.
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Aug;29(10):1-48. doi: 10.3310/CLDC7214.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of acceptability, cardiovascular, neurological, bone health and HRT outcomes following risk reducing surgery in BRCA carriers.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;65:46-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2402-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112.
3
Persistence of fimbrial tissue on the ovarian surface after salpingectomy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):425.e1-425.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
4
Genomics of Ovarian Cancer Progression Reveals Diverse Metastatic Trajectories Including Intraepithelial Metastasis to the Fallopian Tube.
Cancer Discov. 2016 Dec;6(12):1342-1351. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0607. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
7
Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: patients' and professionals' perspectives.
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Feb;136(2):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
9
Long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the nurses' health study.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):709-716. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182864350.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验