Rotz Seth J, Wei Wei, Thomas Stefanie M, Hanna Rabi
Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Pediatric Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Cancer. 2020 Dec 15;126(24):5319-5327. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33175. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Socioeconomic and demographic categories such as income, race, insurance status, and treatment center type are associated with outcomes in acute leukemia. This study was aimed at determining whether the distance to treatment center affects overall survival for children and young adults with acute leukemia.
The National Cancer Database was queried for patients 39 years old or younger who were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A backward elimination procedure was used to select final multivariate Cox models.
In total, 12,301 patients with AML and 22,683 patients with ALL were analyzed. The ALL model included distance to treatment center, Charlson-Deyo score, age, race, insurance status, and community income level. US census definitions of urban and rural were not statistically significant, and no interaction was significant for included variables. Compared with distances > 50 miles, all other distances were associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] for ≤10 miles, 0.91; P = .04; HR for >10 to ≤20 miles, 0.86; P = .004; HR for >20 to ≤50 miles, 0.87; P = .005). The final model for AML included the same variables as the ALL model except for distance to treatment center, which was not statistically significant.
For children and young adults with ALL, distances > 50 miles are associated with inferior overall survival; however, no difference is seen for AML. Although it is unknown whether differences in survival for patients with ALL based on distance are driven by relapse or treatment-related mortality, increased attention to adherence, supportive care, and logistics for patients traveling long distances is warranted.
For children and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, living more than 50 miles from the treatment center is associated with worse outcomes.
社会经济和人口统计学类别,如收入、种族、保险状况和治疗中心类型,与急性白血病的预后相关。本研究旨在确定与治疗中心的距离是否会影响儿童和青年急性白血病患者的总生存期。
查询国家癌症数据库中39岁及以下被诊断为急性髓系白血病(AML)或急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的患者。采用向后消除程序来选择最终的多变量Cox模型。
总共分析了12301例AML患者和22683例ALL患者。ALL模型包括与治疗中心的距离、查尔森-戴约评分、年龄、种族、保险状况和社区收入水平。美国人口普查对城乡的定义无统计学意义,纳入变量之间也无显著交互作用。与距离>50英里相比,所有其他距离均与生存期改善相关(距离≤10英里的风险比[HR]为0.91;P = 0.04;距离>10至≤20英里的HR为0.86;P = 0.004;距离>20至≤50英里的HR为0.87;P = 0.005)。AML的最终模型包括与ALL模型相同的变量,但与治疗中心的距离无统计学意义。
对于儿童和青年ALL患者,距离>50英里与较差的总生存期相关;然而,AML患者未见差异。尽管尚不清楚ALL患者基于距离的生存期差异是由复发还是治疗相关死亡率导致,但对于长途跋涉的患者,应更多关注依从性、支持性护理和后勤保障。
对于患有急性淋巴细胞白血病的儿童和青年,居住在距离治疗中心50英里以上与较差的预后相关。