NUPES - Research Center in Spirituality and Health, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
NUPES - Research Center in Spirituality and Health, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Explore (NY). 2022 Jan-Feb;18(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
Mediumship is understood as a kind of spiritual experience in which a person (i.e., a medium) claims to be in communication with, or under the control of, spiritual beings. In the last decades there has been a resurgence of studies on psychological, psychiatric and neuroscientific aspects of mediumship, as well as studies assessing the claim that mediums can obtain anomalous information from deceased persons.
To assess the evidence for anomalous information reception about deceased people in texts produced through alleged mediumistic writing (psychographic letters) under strictly controlled experimental conditions.
Eight mediums and ninety-four sitters participated in the study. Eighteen mediumistic writing sessions were carried out using blind proxy sitters. Later, each sitter received the target mediumistic letter and five control letters paired by gender and age. Sitters blindly scored the accuracy of the six letters both with a global score and for each of the objectively verifiable items of information presented on the letters. Scores from target and control letters were compared.
There was no difference in global evaluation and specific fit scores between control and target letters. The mediums involved in the research were not able to show evidence for providing anomalous information about deceased people when under our strict controlled conditions. We argue for establishing a reasonable compromise between ecological validity and controlled condition.
灵媒被理解为一种精神体验,在这种体验中,一个人(即灵媒)声称正在与精神实体进行交流,或受到精神实体的控制。在过去的几十年里,对灵媒的心理、精神科和神经科学方面的研究以及对灵媒声称可以从已故者那里获得异常信息的研究有所增加。
在严格控制的实验条件下,评估通过所谓的灵媒写作(心理写作)产生的关于已故者的异常信息接收的证据。
八名灵媒和九十四名参与者参加了这项研究。使用盲代理参与者进行了十八次灵媒写作会议。之后,每位参与者都收到了目标灵媒信件和五个配对的性别和年龄相同的控制信件。参与者对六封信的准确性进行了盲评,包括整体评分和信件上客观可验证的信息的每个项目的评分。比较了目标和控制信件的分数。
在全球评估和特定拟合分数方面,控制信件和目标信件之间没有差异。在我们严格控制的条件下,参与研究的灵媒无法证明他们能够提供关于已故者的异常信息。我们主张在生态有效性和控制条件之间建立合理的妥协。