Suppr超能文献

越裔、苏丹裔和南苏丹裔移民对在低发病地区针对移民社区进行潜伏性结核病筛查和治疗的看法:两个维多利亚社区小组的报告。

Perspectives of Vietnamese, Sudanese and South Sudanese immigrants on targeting migrant communities for latent tuberculosis screening and treatment in low-incidence settings: A report on two Victorian community panels.

机构信息

Australian Centre for Health Engagement Evidence and Values, School of Health & Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Victorian Tuberculosis Program, Melbourne Health at The Doherty Institute for Infection & Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1431-1440. doi: 10.1111/hex.13121. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) elimination strategies in Australia require a focus on groups who are at highest risk of TB infection, such as immigrants from high-burden settings. Understanding attitudes to different strategies for latent TB infection (LTBI) screening and treatment is an important element of justifiable elimination strategies.

METHOD

Two community panels were conducted in Melbourne with members of the Vietnamese (n = 11), Sudanese and South Sudanese communities (n = 9). Panellists were provided with expert information about LTBI and different screening and health communication strategies, then deliberated on how best to pursue TB elimination in Australia.

FINDINGS

Both panels unanimously preferred LTBI screening to occur pre-migration rather than in Australia. Participants were concerned that post-migration screening would reach fewer migrants, noted that conducting LTBI screening in Australia could stigmatize participants and that poor awareness of LTBI would hamper participation. If targeted screening was to occur in Australia, the Vietnamese panel preferred 'place-based' communication strategies, whereas the Sudanese and South Sudanese panel emphasized that community leaders should lead communication strategies to minimize stigma. Both groups emphasized the importance of maintaining community trust in Australian health service providers, and the need to ensure targeting did not undermine this trust.

CONCLUSION

Pre-migration screening was preferred. If post-migration screening is necessary, the potential for stigma should be reduced, benefit and risk profile clearly explained and culturally appropriate communication strategies employed. Cultural attitudes to health providers, personal health management and broader social vulnerabilities of targeted groups need to be considered in the design of screening programs.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚的结核病(TB)消除策略需要关注感染风险最高的群体,例如来自高负担地区的移民。了解对潜伏性结核病感染(LTBI)筛查和治疗的不同策略的态度是合理消除策略的重要组成部分。

方法

在墨尔本进行了两次社区小组讨论,参与者分别来自越南社区(n=11)、苏丹和南苏丹社区(n=9)。小组向参与者提供了有关 LTBI 和不同筛查和健康传播策略的专家信息,然后讨论了如何在澳大利亚最好地实现结核病消除。

结果

两个小组都一致赞成在移民前进行 LTBI 筛查,而不是在澳大利亚进行。参与者担心移民后筛查会接触到更少的移民,指出在澳大利亚进行 LTBI 筛查可能会给参与者带来污名化,而且对 LTBI 的认识不足会阻碍参与。如果在澳大利亚进行有针对性的筛查,越南小组更喜欢“基于地点”的传播策略,而苏丹和南苏丹小组则强调社区领导人应该领导传播策略,以最大限度地减少污名化。两个小组都强调了保持社区对澳大利亚卫生服务提供者信任的重要性,并且需要确保目标人群不破坏这种信任。

结论

移民前筛查是首选。如果需要移民后筛查,应降低污名化的可能性,清楚地解释收益和风险概况,并采用文化上适当的传播策略。在设计筛查计划时,需要考虑目标人群对卫生服务提供者、个人健康管理和更广泛的社会脆弱性的文化态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/298d/7752196/14a9544edda8/HEX-23-1431-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验