Micheletti Steven J, Storfer Andrew
School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2020 Nov;29(21):4091-4101. doi: 10.1111/mec.15627. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Understanding mechanisms that underlie species range limits is at the core of evolutionary ecology. Asymmetric gene flow between larger core populations and smaller edge populations can swamp local adaptation at the range edge and inhibit further range expansion. However, empirical tests of this theory are exceedingly rare. We tested the hypothesis that asymmetric gene flow can constrain local adaptation and thereby species' range limits in an endemic US salamander (Ambystoma barbouri) by determining if gene flow is asymmetric between the core and peripheries of the species' geographic distribution and testing whether local adaptation is swamped at range edges with a reciprocal transplant experiment. Using putatively neutral loci from populations across three core-to-edge transects that covered nearly the entire species' geographic range, we found evidence for asymmetric, core-to-edge gene flow along western and northern transects, but not along a southern transect. Subsequently, the reciprocal transplant experiment suggested that northern and western edge populations are locally adapted despite experiencing asymmetric gene flow, yet have lower fitness in their respective home regions than those of centre population. Conversely, southern populations exhibit low deme quality, experiencing high mortality regardless of where they were reared, probably due to harsher edge habitat conditions. Consequently, we provide rare species-wide evidence that local adaptation can occur despite asymmetric gene flow, though migration from the core may prohibit range expansion by reducing fitness in edge populations. Further, our multitransect study shows that multiple, nonmutually exclusive mechanisms can lead to range limits within a single species.
理解物种分布范围限制背后的机制是进化生态学的核心。较大的核心种群与较小的边缘种群之间的不对称基因流会掩盖分布范围边缘的局部适应性,并抑制分布范围的进一步扩大。然而,对这一理论的实证检验极为罕见。我们通过确定该物种地理分布的核心区域与边缘区域之间的基因流是否不对称,并通过相互移植实验测试分布范围边缘的局部适应性是否被掩盖,来检验不对称基因流会限制局部适应性从而限制物种分布范围这一假设。利用来自覆盖了几乎整个物种地理范围的三条从核心到边缘样带的种群中假定为中性的基因座,我们发现沿西部和北部样带存在从核心到边缘的不对称基因流的证据,但在南部样带没有。随后,相互移植实验表明,尽管北部和西部边缘种群经历了不对称基因流,但它们仍具有局部适应性,不过在各自的原生区域,其适合度低于核心种群。相反,南部种群表现出较低的种群质量,无论在哪里饲养,死亡率都很高,这可能是由于边缘栖息地条件更为恶劣。因此,我们提供了罕见的全物种证据,表明尽管存在不对称基因流,局部适应性仍可能发生,不过来自核心区域的迁移可能会通过降低边缘种群的适合度来阻止分布范围的扩大。此外,我们的多样带研究表明,多种并非相互排斥的机制可导致单一物种内的分布范围限制。