Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Milan, Italy.
Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Sep;35(17):3359-3364. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1818218. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
Placenta previa is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, associated to a high risk of peripartum hemorrhage and hysterectomy. We aimed to verify if prophylactic intraoperative uterine artery embolization in patients with placenta previa and at least one additional risk of bleeding (major placenta previa), can reduce hemorrhage, need for blood transfusions, peripartum hysterectomy and maternal morbidity.
We enrolled 76 patients with major placenta previa; a specific multidisciplinary protocol was designed for management, including ultrasound evaluation, hospitalization at 34 weeks, antenatal corticosteroids and scheduled cesarean section at 35-36 weeks. 44 patients (control group or CTR) were treated with elective cesarean section, 32 patients (embolized group or EMB) underwent selective catheterization of bilateral uterine arteries before cesarean section and subsequent uterine embolization. In both cases cesarean section was performed by a senior surgeon.
Significant differences were found in term of intraoperative blood loss (CTR: 1431 ml; EMB: 693 ml); despite an high percentage of CTR patients had a bleeding greater than 1000 ml (56%), the need for blood transfusion was not significantly different between the two groups. Time of surgery was higher in the EMB group, considering that embolization procedure required approximatively 30 min. Three patients from the CTR group needed hysterectomy and ICU admission, compared to none in the EMB group. Duration of hospitalization and neonatal outcome were similar. Uterine embolization was not related to any short or long-term complications; return to normal menses and preservation of fertility were confirmed at follow up.
Our results are promising, although we believe that a major contribution is referable to the multidisciplinary approach rather than the procedure itself. Nevertheless, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of preventive uterine embolization in patients with placenta previa; in order to establish its prophylactic role in the prevention of peripartum hemorrhage, randomized trial should be carried out, on a larger population.
前置胎盘是产妇发病率和死亡率的主要原因,与围产期出血和子宫切除的高风险相关。我们旨在验证对于至少有一个额外出血风险(主要前置胎盘)的前置胎盘患者,预防性术中子宫动脉栓塞术是否可以减少出血、输血、围产期子宫切除和产妇发病率。
我们纳入了 76 例主要前置胎盘患者;为管理制定了特定的多学科方案,包括超声评估、34 周住院、产前皮质激素和 35-36 周计划剖宫产。44 例患者(对照组或 CTR)接受选择性剖宫产,32 例患者(栓塞组或 EMB)在剖宫产前行双侧子宫动脉选择性导管插入术和随后的子宫栓塞。在这两种情况下,剖宫产均由资深外科医生进行。
术中出血量有显著差异(CTR:1431ml;EMB:693ml);尽管 CTR 组中有 56%的患者出血量超过 1000ml,但两组之间输血需求无显著差异。EMB 组手术时间较长,因为栓塞过程需要大约 30 分钟。CTR 组中有 3 例患者需要子宫切除和入住 ICU,而 EMB 组中没有。住院时间和新生儿结局相似。子宫栓塞与任何短期或长期并发症无关;在随访时证实了正常月经恢复和生育力的保留。
我们的结果很有希望,尽管我们认为多学科方法的贡献更大,而不仅仅是手术本身。然而,我们证明了预防性子宫栓塞在前置胎盘患者中的可行性和安全性;为了确立其在预防围产期出血中的预防作用,应在更大的人群中进行随机试验。