Suppr超能文献

静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合作为心脏移植的桥接是一种可行的选择。

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option as a bridge to heart transplant.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss.

Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss; Department of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):140-147.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Aug 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a rescue therapy for patients in cardiogenic shock. We hypothesize that patients bridged to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have decreased survival.

METHODS

The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2018, for heart transplant recipients. Recipients bridged with any form of mechanical support and those without support were compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The primary end point was restricted mean survival time through 16.7 years.

RESULTS

Of 26,918 recipients, 15,076 required no pretransplant mechanical support (56.0%). Support patients included 9321 with left ventricular assist devices (34.6%), 53 with right ventricular assist devices (0.2%), 258 with total artificial hearts (1.0%), 686 with biventricular assist devices (2.6%), 1378 with intra-aortic balloon pumps (5.1%), and 146 who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.5%). In the first 16.7 years post-transplant, compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, estimated adjusted restricted mean survival time was higher in patients who required no mechanical support (16.6 months [14.0-19.4]) and patients with a left ventricular assist device (16.5 months [99% confidence interval, 13.9-19.2]), an intra-aortic balloon pump (11.2 months [8.3-14.7]), or a biventricular assist device (6.6 months [3.6-10.3]). Restricted mean survival time in patients with a right ventricular assist device or a total artificial heart was similar to patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were estimated to survive 16.6 months less than nonmechanical circulatory support recipients. Bridge to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option, and these patients should be considered transplant candidates.

摘要

目的

体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)是治疗心源性休克患者的抢救疗法。我们假设使用 ECMO 桥接至心脏移植的患者存活率降低。

方法

从 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 31 日,回顾性分析了 United Network of Organ Sharing 数据库中接受心脏移植的患者数据。将接受任何形式机械支持的患者与未接受支持的患者进行比较,并与接受 ECMO 桥接的患者进行比较。主要终点是通过 16.7 年限制平均生存时间。

结果

在 26918 名患者中,15076 名患者在移植前无需机械支持(56.0%)。接受机械支持的患者包括 9321 名左心室辅助装置(34.6%)、53 名右心室辅助装置(0.2%)、258 名全人工心脏(1.0%)、686 名双心室辅助装置(2.6%)、1378 名主动脉内球囊泵(5.1%)和 146 名需要体外膜肺氧合(0.5%)的患者。在移植后前 16.7 年,与接受 ECMO 桥接的患者相比,无需机械支持(16.6 个月[14.0-19.4])、左心室辅助装置(16.5 个月[99%置信区间,13.9-19.2])、主动脉内球囊泵(11.2 个月[8.3-14.7])或双心室辅助装置(6.6 个月[3.6-10.3])的患者估计调整后的限制平均生存时间更高。右心室辅助装置或全人工心脏患者的生存时间与 ECMO 患者相似。

结论

与非机械循环支持的接受者相比,接受 ECMO 桥接的接受者估计存活时间少 16.6 个月。使用 ECMO 桥接至心脏移植是可行的选择,这些患者应被视为移植候选者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验