Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada
New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, New York 10032.
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 7;40(41):7780-7781. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2285-20.2020. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
Professional neuroscience organizations have recently pledged their commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion in examining institutional discrimination; to raise questions about how to train underrepresented scientists; and to recruit underrepresented subjects for a more equitable scientific enterprise in the 21st century. Studies have illuminated racial disparities in funding, likely because of implicit bias in the review process and differential access to resources. We propose that one concrete way to monitor and redress these disparities is to collect and publicize data on grantees by gender, race, ethnicity, and location from neuroscience funding agencies. Beyond remedying historical disadvantages, disseminating funding more equitably across recipients would be an empirical solution that can improve the very quality of neuroscience.
专业神经科学组织最近承诺致力于多样性、公平性和包容性,以审查机构歧视问题;提出如何培训代表性不足的科学家的问题;并招募代表性不足的研究对象,以在 21 世纪建立更公平的科学事业。研究表明,资金存在种族差异,这可能是由于审查过程中的隐性偏见和资源获取的差异造成的。我们提出,监测和纠正这些差异的一个具体方法是,从神经科学资助机构收集和公布按性别、种族、民族和地点分类的受赠者数据。除了纠正历史上的不利因素之外,更公平地在受赠者之间分配资金将是一种经验性的解决方案,可以提高神经科学的质量。