Liu Wei, Liu Pengcheng, Mitlin David
Institute of New-Energy and Low-Carbon Technology (INELT), Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China.
Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Chem Soc Rev. 2020 Oct 19;49(20):7284-7300. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00867b.
This tutorial review explains the emerging understanding of the surface and bulk chemistry - electrochemical performance relations in anode supports (aka secondary current collectors, substrates, templates, hosts) for lithium, sodium and potassium metal batteries (LMBs, SMBs or NMBs, and KMBs or PMBs). In relation to each section, the possible future research directions that may yield both new insight and improved cycling behavior are explored. Representative case studies from Li, Na and K metal anode literature are discussed. The tutorial starts with an overview of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), covering both the "classic" understanding of the SEI structure and the "modern" insights obtained by site-specific cryogenic stage TEM analysis. Next, the multiple roles of supports in promoting cycling stability are detailed. Without an optimized support architecture, the metal-electrolyte interface becomes geometrically unstable at a lower current density and cycle number. Taking into consideration the available literature on LMBs, SMBs and KMBs, it is concluded that effective architectures are geometrically complex and electrochemically lithiophilic, sodiophilic or potassiophilic, so as to promote conformal electrochemical wetting of the metal during plating/stripping. One way that philicity is achieved is through support oxygen surface chemistry, which yields a reversibly reactive metal-support interface. Examples of this include the well-known oxygen-carbon moieties in reduced graphene oxide (rGO), as well as classic ion battery reversible conversion reaction oxides such as SnO2. Unreactive surfaces lead to dewetted island growth of the metal, which is a precursor to dendrites, and possibly to non-uniform dissolution. Surveying the literature on various Li, Na and K metal supports, it is concluded that the key bulk thermodynamic property that will predict electrochemical wetting behavior is the enthalpy of infinite solution (ΔsolH∞) of the metal (solute) into the support (solvent). Large and negative ΔsolH∞ promotes uniform metal wetting on the support surface, corresponding to relatively low plating overpotential. Positive ΔsolH∞ promotes dewetted islands and a relatively high overpotential. This simple rule explains a broad range of studies on Li, Na and K metal - support interactions, including the previously reported correlation between mutual solubility and wetting.
本教程综述解释了人们对锂、钠和钾金属电池(LMBs、SMBs或NMBs,以及KMBs或PMBs)阳极支撑体(又称二次集流体、基底、模板、主体)的表面和体相化学与电化学性能关系的新认识。针对每个部分,探讨了可能产生新见解并改善循环性能的未来研究方向。讨论了锂、钠和钾金属阳极文献中的代表性案例研究。本教程首先概述了固体电解质界面(SEI),涵盖了对SEI结构的“经典”理解以及通过定点低温阶段透射电子显微镜分析获得的“现代”见解。接下来,详细阐述了支撑体在促进循环稳定性方面的多重作用。如果没有优化的支撑体结构,金属-电解质界面在较低电流密度和循环次数下会在几何上变得不稳定。考虑到关于LMBs、SMBs和KMBs的现有文献,得出的结论是,有效的结构在几何上是复杂的,并且在电化学上对锂、钠或钾具有亲合性,以便在电镀/脱镀过程中促进金属的共形电化学润湿。实现亲合性的一种方法是通过支撑体的氧表面化学,这会产生可逆反应的金属-支撑体界面。这方面的例子包括还原氧化石墨烯(rGO)中众所周知的氧-碳部分,以及经典的离子电池可逆转换反应氧化物,如SnO2。无反应性的表面会导致金属的去湿岛状生长,这是枝晶的前兆,并且可能导致不均匀溶解。通过研究各种锂、钠和钾金属支撑体的文献,得出的结论是,预测电化学润湿行为的关键体相热力学性质是金属(溶质)在支撑体(溶剂)中的无限溶解焓(ΔsolH∞)。大的负ΔsolH∞促进金属在支撑体表面的均匀润湿,对应于相对较低的电镀过电位。正的ΔsolH∞促进去湿岛状生长和相对较高的过电位。这个简单的规则解释了关于锂、钠和钾金属与支撑体相互作用的广泛研究,包括先前报道的互溶性与润湿性之间的相关性。