Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.028. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
This study aimed to clarify the predictive significance of youth perceptions of parental criticism assessed using a brief measure designed to enhance clinical utility. We hypothesized that high perceived parental criticism would be associated with more severe depression over 18-months of follow-up.
The study involved secondary analyses from the Youth Partners in Care trial, which demonstrated that a quality improvement intervention aimed at increasing access to evidence-based depression treatment in primary care led to improved depression outcomes at post-treatment compared to usual care enhanced by provider education regarding depression evaluation/management. Patients (N = 418; ages 13-21) were assessed at four time points: baseline; post-treatment (six-month follow-up); 12- and 18-month follow-ups. The primary analysis estimated the effect of perceived parental criticism on likelihood of severe depression (i.e., Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale ≥ 24) over post-intervention follow-ups using a repeated-measures logistic regression model. Secondarily, a linear mixed-effects growth model examined symptom trajectories from baseline through 18-months using the Mental Health Index-5, a measure of emotional distress available at all time-points.
High perceived parental criticism emerged as a robust predictor of clinically-elevated depression (OR=1.66, p=.02) and a more pernicious symptom trajectory over 18-months (β =-1.89, p<.0001).
The association between the self-report perceived criticism and traditional expressed emotion measures derived from verbal and nonverbal parental behaviors was not evaluated.
Results support perceived parental criticism as a predictor of youth depression outcomes over 18-months. This brief measure can be feasibly integrated within clinical assessment to assist clinicians in optimizing treatment benefits.
本研究旨在阐明使用旨在提高临床实用性的简短措施评估的青少年对父母批评的看法的预测意义。我们假设,高感知的父母批评与 18 个月随访期间更严重的抑郁有关。
该研究是对青年伙伴参与护理试验的二次分析,该试验表明,旨在增加初级保健中获得基于证据的抑郁症治疗的质量改进干预措施与提供者接受有关抑郁症评估/管理的教育后增强的常规护理相比,在治疗后改善了抑郁症结局。患者(N=418;年龄 13-21 岁)在四个时间点进行评估:基线;治疗后(六个月随访);12 个月和 18 个月随访。主要分析使用重复测量逻辑回归模型估计感知父母批评对(即,流行病学研究中心抑郁量表≥24)在干预后随访期间发生严重抑郁的可能性的影响。其次,线性混合效应增长模型使用心理健康指数-5 从基线到 18 个月检查症状轨迹,这是一种在所有时间点都可用的衡量情绪困扰的指标。
高感知父母批评是临床显著抑郁(OR=1.66,p=.02)和 18 个月更严重的症状轨迹的有力预测指标(β=-1.89,p<.0001)。
自我报告的感知批评与来自父母言语和非言语行为的传统表达情感措施之间的关联未得到评估。
结果支持感知父母批评是 18 个月内青少年抑郁结局的预测指标。这种简短的措施可以在临床评估中可行地整合,以帮助临床医生优化治疗效果。