Suppr超能文献

成人阿片类药物使用障碍药物维持治疗策略:快速证据综述。

Retention Strategies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Adults: A Rapid Evidence Review.

机构信息

Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR (BC, PTK); Central City Concern, Portland, OR (BC); Scientific Resource Center of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Centers Program, Portland, OR (EG, IAJ, JG, JH, CF, KH, IB, ES, RP, JMG).

出版信息

J Addict Med. 2021;15(1):74-84. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000739.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) save lives, treatment retention remains challenging. Identification of interventions to improve MOUD retention is of interest to policymakers and researchers. On behalf of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, we conducted a rapid evidence review on interventions to improve MOUD retention.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from February 2009 through August 2019 for systematic reviews and randomized trials of care settings, services, logistical support, contingency management, health information technology (IT), extended-release (XR) formulations, and psychosocial interventions that assessed retention at least 3 months.

RESULTS

Two systematic reviews and 39 primary studies were included; most did not focus on retention as the primary outcome. Initiating MOUD in soon-to-be-released incarcerated people improved retention following release. Contingency management may improve retention using antagonist but not agonist MOUD. Retention with interventions integrating medical, psychiatric, social services, or IT did not differ from in-person treatment-as-usual approaches. Retention was comparable with XR- compared to daily buprenorphine formulations and conflicting with XR-naltrexone monthly injection compared to daily buprenorphine. Most psychosocial interventions did not improve retention.

DISCUSSION

Consistent but sparse evidence supports criminal justice prerelease MOUD initiation, and contingency management interventions for antagonist MOUD. Integrating MOUD with medical, psychiatric, social services, delivering through IT, or administering via XR-MOUD formulations did not worsen retention. Fewer than half of the studies we identified focused on retention as a primary outcome. Studies used different measures of retention, making it difficult to compare effectiveness. Additional inquiry into the causes of low retention would inform future interventions.Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42019134739.

摘要

目的

尽管阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)治疗药物能挽救生命,但治疗的维持仍然具有挑战性。寻找改善 MOUD 维持治疗的干预措施是政策制定者和研究人员感兴趣的问题。我们代表美国医疗保健研究与质量局,对改善 MOUD 维持治疗的干预措施进行了快速证据评价。

方法

我们从 2009 年 2 月至 2019 年 8 月在 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索了关于治疗环境、服务、后勤支持、应急管理、健康信息技术(IT)、缓释(XR)制剂以及评估至少 3 个月保留率的心理社会干预的系统评价和随机试验。

结果

纳入了 2 项系统评价和 39 项原始研究;大多数研究并未将保留率作为主要结局。在即将被释放的囚犯中尽早开始 MOUD 可改善释放后的保留率。应急管理可能通过拮抗剂而不是激动剂 MOUD 来提高保留率。与面对面的常规治疗相比,整合医疗、精神科、社会服务或 IT 的干预措施的保留率没有差异。与每日丁丙诺啡制剂相比,XR 制剂与保留率相当,而与每日丁丙诺啡相比,每月纳曲酮注射 XR 制剂的保留率则不一致。大多数心理社会干预措施并未改善保留率。

讨论

尽管有一致但稀疏的证据支持在刑事司法系统释放前启动 MOUD,以及应急管理干预拮抗剂 MOUD。将 MOUD 与医疗、精神科、社会服务相结合,通过 IT 提供或通过 XR-MOUD 制剂给药并不会降低保留率。我们确定的研究中不到一半将保留率作为主要结局。研究使用了不同的保留率测量方法,因此难以比较有效性。进一步研究低保留率的原因将为未来的干预措施提供信息。登记号:PROSPERO:CRD42019134739。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b5e/7864607/0181b53b8f13/adm-15-74-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验