Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637, Poznan, Poland.
Institute of Environmental Protection-National Research Institute, Kolektorska 4, 01-692, Warsaw, Poland.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5383-5397. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10731-1. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Since 2000, after the Water Framework Directive came into force, aquatic ecosystems' bioassessment has acquired immense practical importance for water management. Currently, due to extensive scientific research and monitoring, we have gathered comprehensive hydrobiological databases. The amount of available data increases with each subsequent year of monitoring, and the efficient analysis of these data requires the use of proper mathematical tools. Our study challenges the comparison of the modelling potential between four indices for the ecological status assessment of lakes based on three groups of aquatic organisms, i.e. phytoplankton, phytobenthos and macrophytes. One of the deep learning techniques, artificial neural networks, has been used to predict values of four biological indices based on the limited set of the physicochemical parameters of water. All analyses were conducted separately for lakes with various stratification regimes as they function differently. The best modelling quality in terms of high values of coefficients of determination and low values of the normalised root mean square error was obtained for chlorophyll a followed by phytoplankton multimetric. A lower degree of fit was obtained in the networks for macrophyte index, and the poorest model quality was obtained for phytobenthos index. For all indices, modelling quality for non-stratified lakes was higher than this for stratified lakes, giving a higher percentage of variance explained by the networks and lower values of errors. Sensitivity analysis showed that among physicochemical parameters, water transparency (Secchi disk reading) exhibits the strongest relationship with the ecological status of lakes derived by phytoplankton and macrophytes. At the same time, all input variables indicated a negligible impact on phytobenthos index. In this way, different explanations of the relationship between biological and trophic variables were revealed.
自 2000 年《水框架指令》生效以来,水生生态系统的生物评估在水管理方面具有重要的实际意义。目前,由于广泛的科学研究和监测,我们已经收集了全面的水生生物学数据库。随着监测工作的逐年推进,可用数据量不断增加,而对这些数据的有效分析需要使用适当的数学工具。我们的研究挑战了基于三类水生生物(浮游植物、底栖植物和大型水生植物)对湖泊生态状况评估的四种指数的建模潜力的比较。深度学习技术之一的人工神经网络已被用于根据有限的水质理化参数预测四个生物指数的值。所有分析都是针对具有不同分层制度的湖泊进行的,因为它们的功能不同。叶绿素 a 随后是浮游植物多指标,其决定系数值较高且归一化均方根误差值较低,在这些方面获得了最佳的建模质量。大型水生植物指数的网络拟合程度较低,底栖植物指数的模型质量最差。对于所有指数,非分层湖泊的建模质量均高于分层湖泊,网络解释的方差比例更高,误差值更低。敏感性分析表明,在理化参数中,水透明度(塞奇圆盘读数)与浮游植物和大型水生植物得出的湖泊生态状况之间存在最强的关系。同时,所有输入变量都表明对底栖植物指数的影响可以忽略不计。这样,就揭示了生物变量和营养变量之间关系的不同解释。