Darr Humaa, Abbas Maher A
Department of Surgery - Surgical Oncology, Al Zahra Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Surgery - Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, Al Zahra Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020 Sep;33(5):279-286. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713745. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Endoscopic stenting of the colorectum has emerged as a viable alternative to surgical interventions in a selected group of patients. The main indication for stenting is bowel obstruction. As such stenting can be used to palliate patients with metastatic disease or bridge patients to surgical intervention. The main advantages of stenting in the emergency setting include lower morbidity and mortality, lower incidence of stoma formation, shorter hospitalization, and better quality of life. For patients with unresectable disease and short life expectancy, stenting can be considered. However, for patients with longer life expectancy, the potential long-term complications of a metal stent such as erosion, migration, or obstruction have engendered debate whether such patients are better served by operative intervention. Stenting as a bridge to surgery is an alternative to surgery in patients who are high risk for emergency surgery but concerns remain regarding its impact on oncologic outcome in potentially curable patients.
对于特定患者群体,结直肠内镜支架置入术已成为手术干预的一种可行替代方案。支架置入的主要适应证是肠梗阻。因此,支架可用于缓解转移性疾病患者的症状或作为患者接受手术干预的过渡手段。在急诊情况下,支架置入的主要优点包括较低的发病率和死亡率、较低的造口形成率、较短的住院时间以及更好的生活质量。对于无法切除的疾病且预期寿命较短的患者,可以考虑进行支架置入。然而,对于预期寿命较长的患者,金属支架的潜在长期并发症,如侵蚀、移位或阻塞,引发了关于此类患者是否通过手术干预能得到更好治疗的争论。作为手术过渡手段的支架置入是急诊手术高风险患者的一种手术替代方案,但对于潜在可治愈患者,其对肿瘤学结局的影响仍存在担忧。