Choratas Aristides, Papastavrou Evridiki, Charalambous Andreas, Kouta Christiana
Nursing Department, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Nursing Department, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 2;10:1366. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01366. eCollection 2020.
Breathlessness is the most common and refractory symptom in lung cancer patients. Even though various educational programmes have been developed, only a few were intended for implementation in the home setting for its management. Feasibility of a study for implementing a nurse-led educational programme for breathlessness management of lung cancer patients at home. A randomized feasibility study was undertaken between February 2017 and October 2018. Patients were recruited through referral from oncologists from two oncology centers in Cyprus under certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were randomized in the intervention or control group via a computer programme, and their named family caregivers (f.c.) were allocated in the same group. Participants were not blinded to group assignment. The intervention consisted of a PowerPoint presentation and implementation of three non-pharmacological interventions. The control group received usual care. Patients were assessed for breathlessness, anxiety, and depression levels, whereas f.c. were assessed for anxiety, depression, and burden levels. F.c. also assessed patients' dyspnea level. The duration of the study process for both the intervention and control group was over a period of 4 weeks. Twenty-four patients and their f.c. ( = 24) were allocated equally in the intervention and control group. Five patients withdrew, and the final sample entered analysis was 19 patients and 19 family caregivers. In the intervention group = 11 + 11, and in the control group = 8 + 8. In the intervention group patients' breathlessness and anxiety levels showed improvement and their f.c.s in the anxiety and burden levels. Major consideration was the sample size and the recruitment of the patients by the referring oncologists. Attrition was minor during the study process. No harm was recorded by the participants of the study. The study provided evidence of the feasibility of the implementation of the educational programme. For the future definitive study major consideration should be patients' recruitment method in order to achieve adequate sample size. Moreover, qualitative data should be collected in relation to the intervention and the involvement of f.c. The feasibility study was registered to the Cyprus Bioethics Committee with the registration number 2016/16. There was no funding of the study.
呼吸困难是肺癌患者最常见且难以治疗的症状。尽管已经开展了各种教育项目,但只有少数项目旨在在家中实施以管理该症状。一项关于在家中为肺癌患者实施由护士主导的呼吸困难管理教育项目的研究的可行性。2017年2月至2018年10月期间进行了一项随机可行性研究。通过塞浦路斯两个肿瘤中心的肿瘤学家根据特定的纳入和排除标准进行转诊来招募患者。通过计算机程序将患者随机分为干预组或对照组,其指定的家庭照顾者被分配到同一组。参与者不设盲。干预包括一次PowerPoint演示和实施三种非药物干预措施。对照组接受常规护理。对患者的呼吸困难、焦虑和抑郁水平进行评估,而对家庭照顾者的焦虑、抑郁和负担水平进行评估。家庭照顾者还评估患者的呼吸困难程度。干预组和对照组的研究过程持续时间均为4周。24名患者及其家庭照顾者(n = 24)被平均分配到干预组和对照组。5名患者退出,最终纳入分析的样本为19名患者和19名家庭照顾者。干预组中n = 11 + 11,对照组中n = 8 + 8。干预组患者的呼吸困难和焦虑水平有所改善,其家庭照顾者的焦虑和负担水平也有所改善。主要考虑因素是样本量以及转诊肿瘤学家对患者进行招募的情况。研究过程中的损耗较小。研究参与者未记录到不良影响。该研究提供了实施该教育项目可行性的证据。对于未来的确定性研究,主要考虑因素应是患者的招募方法,以达到足够的样本量。此外,应收集与干预措施以及家庭照顾者参与情况相关的定性数据。该可行性研究已在塞浦路斯生物伦理委员会注册,注册号为2016/16。该研究没有资金支持。