• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在芝加哥一个服务不足的人群中实施循证干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的有效性和成本

Effectiveness and Cost of Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Underserved Population in Chicago.

作者信息

Kim Karen E, Tangka Florence K L, Jayaprakash Manasi, Randal Fornessa T, Lam Helen, Freedman David, Carrier Laurie A, Sargant Coletta, Maene Chieko, Hoover Sonja, Joseph Djenaba, French Cynthia, Subramanian Sujha

机构信息

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):884-890. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954162. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/1524839920954162
PMID:32990041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7894065/
Abstract

With funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program, The University of Chicago Center for Asian Health Equity partnered with a federally qualified health center (FQHC) to implement multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in order to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness and cost of implementing a provider reminder system entered manually and supplemented with patient reminders and provider assessment and feedback. The FQHC collected demographic characteristics of the FQHC and outcome data from January 2015 through December 2015 (preimplementation period) and cost from January 2016 through September 2017 (implementation period). Cost data were collected for the implementation period. We report on the demographics of the eligible population, CRC screening order, completion rates by sociodemographic characteristics, and, overall, the effectiveness and cost of implementation. From the preimplementation phase to the implementation phase, there was a 21.2 percentage point increase in CRC screens completed. The total cost of implementing EBIs was $40908.97. We estimated that an additional 283 screens were completed because of the interventions, and the implementation cost of the interventions was $144.65 per additional screen. With the interventions, CRC screening uptake in Chicago increased for all race/ethnicity and demographic backgrounds at the FQHC, particularly for patients aged 50 to 64 years and for Asian, Hispanic, and uninsured patients.

摘要

在疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制项目的资助下,芝加哥大学亚洲健康公平中心与一家联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)合作,实施多项循证干预措施(EBI),以提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的接受率。本研究的目的是确定实施手动输入并辅以患者提醒以及提供者评估和反馈的提供者提醒系统的有效性和成本。FQHC收集了2015年1月至2015年12月(实施前期)的FQHC人口统计学特征和结果数据,以及2016年1月至2017年9月(实施期)的成本数据。收集了实施期的成本数据。我们报告了符合条件人群的人口统计学特征、CRC筛查顺序、按社会人口统计学特征划分的完成率,以及总体实施的有效性和成本。从实施前期到实施期,完成的CRC筛查增加了21.2个百分点。实施EBI的总成本为40908.97美元。我们估计,由于这些干预措施,额外完成了283次筛查,干预措施的实施成本为每次额外筛查144.65美元。通过这些干预措施,FQHC所有种族/族裔和人口背景的芝加哥居民的CRC筛查接受率都有所提高,尤其是50至64岁的患者以及亚洲、西班牙裔和未参保患者。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and Cost of Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among an Underserved Population in Chicago.在芝加哥一个服务不足的人群中实施循证干预措施以提高结直肠癌筛查率的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):884-890. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954162. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
2
Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost-effectiveness.为服务弱势群体的 2 个医疗保健系统中的结直肠癌筛查干预措施:筛查参与度和成本效益。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4130-4136. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31691. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
3
The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky.在肯塔基州东部一家符合联邦资格的无家可归者诊所提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):905-909. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers.使用循证干预措施和实施策略增加联邦合格健康中心的结直肠癌筛查。
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1044-1052. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0520-2.
5
Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center.考察医疗服务提供者激励措施在社区医疗中提高结直肠癌筛查接受率的有效性:以加利福尼亚州一家联邦合格健康中心为例
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):898-904. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954166. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.2009-2015 年,癌症控制项目受赠者对基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的采用和实施情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E139. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180682.
7
Implementing a multilevel intervention to accelerate colorectal cancer screening and follow-up in federally qualified health centers using a stepped wedge design: a study protocol.采用阶梯式楔形设计在联邦合格健康中心实施多层次干预以加速结直肠癌筛查和随访:研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 29;15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01045-4.
8
Rationale and design of Mi-CARE: The mile square colorectal cancer screening, awareness and referral and education project.米-关爱(Mi-CARE)项目的基本原理与设计:一平方英里结直肠癌筛查、认知、转诊及教育项目
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jan;52:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
9
Correlates of colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care clinics serving low income, medically underserved populations.为低收入、医疗服务不足人群提供服务的基层医疗诊所中结直肠癌筛查率的相关因素。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105774. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105774. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
10
Implementing Mailed Colorectal Cancer Fecal Screening Tests in Real-World Primary Care Settings: Promising Implementation Practices and Opportunities for Improvement.在真实初级保健环境中实施邮寄结直肠癌粪便筛查检测:有前景的实施实践和改进机会。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):124-135. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01496-3. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Healthcare Providers in Shared Decision Making for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Ghana: A Qualitative Study.医疗服务提供者在加纳宫颈癌预防共同决策中的作用:一项定性研究
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 13:rs.3.rs-5436571. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5436571/v1.
2
Interventions to improve access to cancer care in underserved populations in high income countries: a systematic review.改善高收入国家医疗服务不足人群癌症护理可及性的干预措施:一项系统评价
Oncol Rev. 2024 Nov 5;18:1427441. doi: 10.3389/or.2024.1427441. eCollection 2024.
3
Mi-CARE: Comparing Three Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening among Ethnic Minorities within Three Different Clinical Contexts.美加爱护航:在三种不同临床环境下,比较三种循证干预措施在少数民族群体中促进结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 10;20(22):7049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227049.
4
How to Perform Economic Evaluation in Implementation Studies: Imaging-Specific Considerations and Comparison of Financial Models.如何在实施研究中进行经济评价:成像特定考虑因素和财务模型比较。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Mar;20(3):292-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.11.018.
5
Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.增加多种癌症筛查接受度的综合干预措施及支持活动:概念框架、实施成功的决定因素、测量挑战及研究重点
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00353-8.
6
Multi-component interventions and change in screening rates in primary care clinics in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program.结直肠癌控制项目中基层医疗诊所的多组分干预措施及筛查率变化
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 9;29:101904. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101904. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Pragmatic considerations and approaches for measuring staff time as an implementation cost in health systems and clinics: key issues and applied examples.将员工时间作为卫生系统和诊所实施成本进行衡量的务实考量与方法:关键问题及应用实例
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Apr 15;3(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00292-4.
8
The Effectiveness and Cost to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Federally Qualified Homeless Clinic in Eastern Kentucky.在肯塔基州东部一家符合联邦资格的无家可归者诊所提高结直肠癌筛查的有效性和成本
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):905-909. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.联邦合格医疗中心增加结直肠癌筛查干预措施的经济评估
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Nov;21(6):877-883. doi: 10.1177/1524839920954168. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in Screening Quality in a Federal Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for the Uninsured.联邦无保险人群结直肠癌筛查项目中的筛查质量差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 May 30;16:E67. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180452.
2
Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.开发基于网络的结直肠癌筛查计划成本评估工具。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 May 2;16:E54. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180336.
3
Identifying optimal approaches to scale up colorectal cancer screening: an overview of the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)'s learning laboratory.确定扩大结直肠癌筛查的最佳方法:疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)学习实验室概述
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Feb;30(2):169-175. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1109-x. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
4
Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost-effectiveness.为服务弱势群体的 2 个医疗保健系统中的结直肠癌筛查干预措施:筛查参与度和成本效益。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4130-4136. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31691. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center.基于芝加哥大学医疗中心实际情况的结肠镜检查结直肠癌筛查中患者导航的经济评估。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4137-4144. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31690. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Evaluation of patient-focused interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening among new york state medicaid managed care patients.评估以患者为中心的干预措施在促进纽约州医疗补助管理式护理患者中进行结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4145-4153. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31692. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
A conceptual framework and metrics for evaluating multicomponent interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening within an organized screening program.用于评估在有组织的筛查计划中增加结直肠癌筛查的多组分干预措施的概念框架和指标。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4154-4162. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31686. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.评估参与结直肠癌筛查的促进因素和障碍的定性研究的系统评价与荟萃综合分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jun;25(6):907-17. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0990. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.干预措施提高乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的效果:《社区预防服务指南》的 9 项更新系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):97-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009.