Lyu S G, Lu X H, Yang T J, Sun Y L, Li X T, Miao C H
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China.
Department of Urology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450008, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 13;100(37):2947-2951. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200616-01866.
To investigate the effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with butorphanol versus sufentanil on early postoperative rehabilitation following radical laparoscopic nephrectomy. One hundred patients undergoing radical laparoscopic nephrectomy in Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from September 2018 to February 2020 were divided into two groups (=50) using a random number table: butorphanol patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (group A) and sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (group B). Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed at the end of surgery. The formulation of group A was butorphanol (0.15 mg/kg) and ketorolac tromethamine (180 mg) using the physiological saline at a dilution of 100 ml. The formulation of group B was sufentanil (1.5 μg/kg) and ketorolac tromethamine (180 mg) using the physiological saline at a dilution of 100 ml. At the time points of 4, 8, 24, 48 h after operation (T(1), T(2), T(3), T(4)), VAS scores at rest and cough were recorded. The incidence of remedial analgesia, the number of pressings during 48 h after the operation, the postoperative anal exhaust recovery time of the patients were recorded. Quality of recovery-40(QoR-40) scores were recorded at T(3) and T(4). Adverse reactions were recorded. There was no significant difference in VAS scores at rest and cough at T(1), T(2), T(3) and T(4) between two groups (all >0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of remedial analgesia and the number of pressings during 48 h after the operation between two groups (all >0.05). The postoperative anal exhaust recovery time of the patients in group A was (32±6) h, which was lower than that in group B with statistically significant difference [(40±5) h, =7.937, <0.01]. The QoR-40 total scores in group A were higher than those in group B at T(3) and T(4), which were (185.8±2.5) vs (170.7±2.7), (194.8±1.9) vs (183.6±2.6), and the differences were statistically significant (=28.878, 25.025, all <0.01). The incidence of nausea, retching/vomiting, respiratory depression and itch during 48 h after the operation in group A were 10%, 6%, 2%, 2%, which were lower than that in group B (32%, 20%, 14%, 18%), with statistically significant difference (χ(2)=7.294, 4.322, 4.891, 5.983, all <0.05). PCIA with butorphanol or sufentanil can provide satisfactory analgesia for patients undergoing radical laparoscopic nephrectomy, but butorphanol can promote postoperative rehabilitation with fewer adverse reactions.
探讨布托啡诺与舒芬太尼自控静脉镇痛对腹腔镜肾癌根治术后早期康复的影响。选取2018年9月至2020年2月在郑州大学附属肿瘤医院行腹腔镜肾癌根治术的100例患者,采用随机数字表法分为两组(每组50例):布托啡诺自控静脉镇痛组(A组)和舒芬太尼自控静脉镇痛组(B组)。手术结束后行自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。A组配方为布托啡诺(0.15 mg/kg)和酮咯酸氨丁三醇(180 mg),用生理盐水稀释至100 ml。B组配方为舒芬太尼(1.5 μg/kg)和酮咯酸氨丁三醇(180 mg),用生理盐水稀释至100 ml。于术后4、8、24、48 h(T1、T2、T3、T4)记录静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。记录补救性镇痛的发生率、术后48 h内的按压次数、患者术后肛门排气恢复时间。于T3、T4记录恢复质量-40(QoR-40)评分。记录不良反应。两组在T1、T2、T3、T4时静息和咳嗽时的VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组补救性镇痛的发生率和术后48 h内的按压次数差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。A组患者术后肛门排气恢复时间为(32±6)h,低于B组,差异有统计学意义[(40±5)h,t=7.937,P<0.01]。A组在T3、T4时的QoR-40总分高于B组,分别为(185.8±2.5)分与(170.7±2.7)分、(194.8±1.9)分与(183.6±2.6)分,差异有统计学意义(t=28.878、25.025,均P<0.01)。A组术后48 h内恶心、干呕/呕吐、呼吸抑制及瘙痒的发生率分别为10%、6%、2%、2%,低于B组(32%、20%、14%、18%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.294、4.322、4.891、5.983,均P<0.05)。布托啡诺或舒芬太尼PCIA可为腹腔镜肾癌根治术患者提供满意的镇痛效果,但布托啡诺能促进术后康复且不良反应较少。