Pae Chi-Un
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Cell Death Disease Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Chonnam Med J. 2020 Sep;56(3):157-165. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.3.157. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
Antipsychotics have been utilized as the standard treatment for schizophrenia regardless of illness phase where antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is routinely recommended as the gold standard rather than antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP). However, approximately 20 to 40% of patients with schizophrenia do not respond to APM based on randomized controlled clinical trials and large practical clinical trials indicating that the subgroup of patients with schizophrenia would need differential treatment approaches beyond traditional treatment strategies such as APM. Numerous studies have supported the use of APP in particular for patients with certain clinical situations including: failure to show efficacy or tolerability from treatment with APM, need for different treatment for targeting specific symptom domains, severe illness, failure to treatment with clozapine, skepticism about following treatment guidelines, or cross titration periods. Furthermore, recent large cohort studies and practical clinical trials have proposed more benefits of APP rather than APM in terms of rehospitalization, mortality, and specific symptoms. APP has recently become more widely utilized and recognized as one of the next treatment strategies to clinicians for patients with schizophrenia. Some experts have already proposed the revision of treatment guidelines incorporating APP as evidence-based treatment option for certain patients with schizophrenia. Taken together, APP now deserves an evidence-based and acceptable treatment strategy, not an empirical or preferential treatment approach for treatment of schizophrenia in contemporary clinical practice.
无论处于疾病的哪个阶段,抗精神病药物一直被用作精神分裂症的标准治疗方法,其中抗精神病药物单一疗法(APM)通常被推荐为金标准,而非抗精神病药物联合疗法(APP)。然而,根据随机对照临床试验和大型实际临床试验,约20%至40%的精神分裂症患者对APM无反应,这表明精神分裂症患者亚组需要超越APM等传统治疗策略的差异化治疗方法。许多研究支持使用APP,特别是针对某些临床情况的患者,包括:APM治疗无效或不耐受、需要针对特定症状领域进行不同治疗、病情严重、氯氮平治疗失败、对遵循治疗指南持怀疑态度或交叉滴定期。此外,最近的大型队列研究和实际临床试验表明,在再住院、死亡率和特定症状方面,APP比APM有更多益处。APP最近已被更广泛地使用,并被临床医生视为精神分裂症患者的下一种治疗策略之一。一些专家已经提议修订治疗指南,将APP纳入某些精神分裂症患者的循证治疗选择。综上所述,在当代临床实践中,APP现在值得作为一种循证且可接受的治疗策略,而不是一种经验性或优先性的精神分裂症治疗方法。