Verdugo Edgard M, Gifford Mac, Glover Caitlin, Cuthbertson Amy A, Trenholm Rebecca A, Kimura Susana Y, Liberatore Hannah K, Richardson Susan D, Stanford Benjamin D, Summers R Scott, Dickenson Eric R V
Water Quality Research and Development, Southern Nevada Water Authority, 1299, Burkholder Blvd., Henderson, United States.
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, 631 Sumter St., Columbia, SC 29208, United States.
Water Res X. 2020 Sep 10;9:100068. doi: 10.1016/j.wroa.2020.100068. eCollection 2020 Dec 1.
This study measured chlorine- and chloramine-reactive precursors using formation potential (FP) tests of nine U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulated and 57 unregulated disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in tertiary-filtered wastewater before and after pilot-scale granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption. Using breakthrough of precursor concentration and of concentration associated calculated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity (by correlating known lethal concentrations reported elsewhere), the performance of three parallel GAC treatment trains were compared against tertiary-filtered wastewater: ozone/GAC, chlorine/GAC, and GAC alone. Results show GAC alone was the primary process, versus ozone or chlorine alone, to remove the largest fraction of total chlorine- and chloramine-reactive DBP precursors and calculated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity potencies. GAC with pre-ozonation removed the most chlorine- and chloramine-reactive DBP precursors followed by GAC with pre-chlorination and lastly GAC without pre-treatment. GAC with pre-ozonation produced an effluent with cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of DBPs from FP that generally matched that of GAC without pre-oxidation; meanwhile removal of toxicity was greater by GAC with pre-chlorination. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of DBPs from FP tests did not scale with DBP concentration; for example, more than 90% of the calculated cytotoxicity resulted from 20% of the DBPs, principally from haloacetaldehydes, haloacetamides, and haloacetonitriles. The calculated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity from DBPs associated with FP-chloramination were at times higher than with FP-chlorination though the concentration of DBPs was five times higher with FP-chlorination. The removal of DBP precursors using GAC based treatment was at least as effective as removal of DOC (except for halonitromethanes for GAC without pre-oxidation and with pre-chlorination), indicating DOC can be used as an indicator for DBP precursor adsorption efficacy. However, the DOC was not a good surrogate for total cytotoxicity and genotoxicity breakthrough behavior, therefore, unregulated DBPs could have negative health implications that are disconnected from general water quality parameters, such as DOC, and regulated classes of DBPs. Instead, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity correlate with the concentration of specific classes of unregulated DBPs.
本研究通过对美国环境保护局(EPA)规定的9种和57种未规定的消毒副产物(DBP)进行生成势(FP)测试,来测定三级过滤废水中颗粒活性炭(GAC)吸附前后的氯和氯胺反应性前体。利用前体浓度的突破以及与计算得出的细胞毒性和遗传毒性相关的浓度(通过关联其他地方报道的已知致死浓度),将三个平行的GAC处理系列的性能与三级过滤废水进行了比较:臭氧/GAC、氯/GAC和单独的GAC。结果表明,与单独的臭氧或氯相比,单独的GAC是去除总氯和氯胺反应性DBP前体以及计算得出的细胞毒性和遗传毒性效力最大部分的主要工艺。预臭氧氧化的GAC去除的氯和氯胺反应性DBP前体最多,其次是预氯化的GAC,最后是未预处理的GAC。预臭氧氧化的GAC产生的FP中DBP的细胞毒性和遗传毒性的流出物通常与未预氧化的GAC相匹配;同时,预氯化的GAC对毒性的去除效果更好。FP测试中DBP的细胞毒性和遗传毒性与DBP浓度不成比例;例如,超过90%的计算得出的细胞毒性来自20%的DBP,主要是卤代乙醛、卤代乙酰胺和卤代乙腈。尽管FP氯化时DBP的浓度高出五倍,但与FP氯胺化相关的DBP计算得出的细胞毒性和遗传毒性有时高于FP氯化时的情况。基于GAC的处理对DBP前体的去除效果至少与对溶解性有机碳(DOC)的去除效果一样好(未预氧化和预氯化的GAC对卤代硝基甲烷除外),这表明DOC可作为DBP前体吸附效果的指标。然而,DOC并不是总细胞毒性和遗传毒性突破行为的良好替代指标,因此,未规定的DBP可能会对健康产生负面影响,而这些影响与一般水质参数(如DOC)和规定类别的DBP无关。相反,细胞毒性和遗传毒性与特定类别的未规定DBP的浓度相关。