Suppr超能文献

ENCHANTED 试验中重度缺血性脑卒中患者强化降压与标准降压治疗的效果比较。

Comparative effects of intensive-blood pressure versus standard-blood pressure-lowering treatment in patients with severe ischemic stroke in the ENCHANTED trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Faculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2021 Feb 1;39(2):280-285. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002640.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Limited data exist on the optimum level of SBP in thrombolyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to determine the effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering, specifically in patients with severe AIS who participated in the international, Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study.

METHODS

Prespecificed subgroup analyzes of the BP arm of Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study, a multicenter, partial-factorial, open, blinded outcome assessed trial, in which 2227 thrombolysis-eligible and treated AIS patients with elevated SBP (>150 mmHg) were randomized to intensive (target 130-140 mmHg) or guideline-recommended (<180 mmHg) BP management. Severe stroke was defined by computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiogram confirmation of large-vessel occlusion, receipt of endovascular therapy, final diagnosis of large artery atheromatous disease, or high (>10) baseline neurological scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The primary efficacy outcome was death or any disability (modified Rankin scale scores 2-6). The key safety outcome was intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Treatment effects estimated in logistic regression models are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

There were 1311 patients [mean age 67 years; 37% female; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale of 11 (range 6.0-15.0)] with severe AIS. Overall, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of death or disability. However, intensive BP lowering significantly increased mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09-2.13; P = 0.014) compared with guideline BP lowering, despite significantly lowering clinician-reported ICH (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Intensive BP lowering is associated with increased mortality in patients with severe AIS despite lowering the risk of ICH. Further randomized trials are required to provide reliable evidence over the optimum SBP target in the most serious type of AIS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01422616.

摘要

目的

急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)溶栓患者的 SBP 最佳水平数据有限。我们旨在确定强化降压的影响,特别是在参加国际强化控制高血压和溶栓治疗缺血性脑卒中研究的严重 AIS 患者中。

方法

增强控制高血压和溶栓治疗缺血性脑卒中研究降压臂的预设亚组分析,该研究为多中心、部分因子、开放、盲法结局评估试验,纳入 2227 例 SBP 升高(>150mmHg)的溶栓合格和治疗 AIS 患者,随机分为强化(目标 130-140mmHg)或指南推荐(<180mmHg)血压管理。严重脑卒中的定义为计算机断层扫描或磁共振血管造影证实大血管闭塞、接受血管内治疗、最终诊断为大动脉粥样硬化性疾病或 NIHSS 基线评分较高(>10)。主要疗效终点为死亡或任何残疾(改良 Rankin 量表评分 2-6)。关键安全性结局为颅内出血(ICH)。报告逻辑回归模型中估计的治疗效果为比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

1311 例患者[平均年龄 67 岁;37%女性;基线 NIHSS 中位数为 11(范围 6.0-15.0)]存在严重 AIS。总体而言,主要结局死亡或残疾无显著差异。然而,与指南降压相比,强化降压显著增加死亡率(OR 1.52,95%CI 1.09-2.13;P=0.014),尽管显著降低了临床医生报告的 ICH(OR 0.63,95%CI 0.43-0.92;P=0.016)。

结论

尽管强化降压降低了 ICH 的风险,但在严重 AIS 患者中与死亡率增加相关。需要进一步的随机试验来提供最严重类型的 AIS 中最佳 SBP 目标的可靠证据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01422616。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验