Upson Kristen
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2020 Sep;7(3):149-170. doi: 10.1007/s40471-020-00236-3. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
Recent studies of environmental chemicals and endometriosis were critically evaluated from the epidemiologic perspective to identify aspects of study design and analyses that may contribute to discrepant results across studies.
Of the 29 studies reviewed, 12 studies used new approaches to population-based sampling. The remaining studies were conducted primarily among patients undergoing pelvic surgery; controls may not represent the exposure experience of the underlying study base, resulting in biased estimates of associations. Most studies used biologic specimens collected near diagnosis and varied in analytic approaches to minimize bias. Few studies investigated ovarian, deep-infiltrating, and peritoneal endometriosis presentations separately.
Recommendations to move the field forward include: (1) control selection from a defined study base, (2) exposure characterization during the etiologically-relevant window, (3) employment of best practices to minimize bias in analyses, and (4) separate consideration of endometriosis presentations that may be etiologically-distinct entities.
从流行病学角度对近期关于环境化学物质与子宫内膜异位症的研究进行严格评估,以确定研究设计和分析中可能导致各研究结果存在差异的方面。
在所审查的29项研究中,12项研究采用了基于人群抽样的新方法。其余研究主要在接受盆腔手术的患者中进行;对照组可能无法代表基础研究人群的暴露经历,从而导致关联估计出现偏差。大多数研究使用在诊断时附近采集的生物标本,且分析方法各不相同,以尽量减少偏差。很少有研究分别调查卵巢型、深部浸润型和腹膜型子宫内膜异位症的表现。
推动该领域发展的建议包括:(1)从明确的研究人群中选择对照;(2)在病因相关窗口期进行暴露特征描述;(3)采用最佳实践以尽量减少分析中的偏差;(4)分别考虑可能在病因上不同的子宫内膜异位症表现。