J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2020 Dec;22(6):489-494. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000695.
Agitation is a common, treatable symptom that profoundly impacts quality of life and exacerbates caregiver fatigue in the hospice setting for patients with dementia. The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy of tailored nonpharmacological interventions for mitigation of unwanted behaviors in the population of patients with behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia while receiving hospice care. The 4-domain Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (PAS; Motor, Verbal, Aggressive, Resistance to Care) was used for multiple baseline and posttest measurements of agitation. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions was evaluated using analysis of variance for repeated measures for the total PAS score. Motor agitation was the presenting problem with highest-rated severity compared with Verbal, Aggression, and Resistance to Care domains. Analysis of variance demonstrated no difference between baseline referral and pretest total PAS measures (P = .8), but a significant drop in total PAS agitation after intervention (P < .001). The best outcomes, however, were with patients receiving both nonpharmacological and standard pharmacological interventions as opposed to nonpharmacological interventions alone (P = .034). For patients with dementia presenting with behavioral and psychological symptoms, selected nonpharmacological interventions provide significant mitigation of agitation.
激越症状是一种常见且可治疗的症状,在痴呆患者的临终关怀环境中,它会显著影响生活质量并加剧照护者的疲劳感。本研究的目的在于分析针对痴呆患者行为和心理症状人群的特定非药物干预措施在减轻不受欢迎行为方面的疗效,这些患者正在接受临终关怀。采用匹兹堡激越量表(PAS;运动、言语、攻击、抗拒护理)的 4 个领域进行激越的多次基线和测试后测量。使用重复测量方差分析来评估非药物干预措施的有效性,用于总 PAS 评分。与言语、攻击和抗拒护理领域相比,运动性激越的表现问题和严重程度最高。方差分析显示,基线转介和测试前总 PAS 测量之间没有差异(P =.8),但干预后总 PAS 激越显著下降(P <.001)。然而,与仅接受非药物干预相比,接受非药物和标准药物联合干预的患者效果最佳(P =.034)。对于患有行为和心理症状的痴呆患者,选择的非药物干预措施可显著减轻激越症状。