Paediatric, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Quality, Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Oct;9(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000935.
In 2015, senior consultants at Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research saw several sick children in their outpatient clinics for which they had been seen in the emergency department the previous day. These children seemed to require admission but were sent home. This prompted us to review the paediatric care provided in our emergency department.
A multidisciplinary team was formed to run this improvement initiative. Review of literature suggested that establishing a triage system around a prevalidated triage tool would help us deliver more appropriate care. The South African Triage Scale was selected and adapted.
With the aim of delivering appropriate care to at least 50% of children, a series of sequential interventions were tested using the improvement methodology of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, an approach recommended by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Learnings from the PDSA cycle of the previous intervention helped decide the subsequent change idea. The interventions included training in use of tool, increasing nurse staffing levels, using team huddles as feedback opportunities, introducing nurse reminders, reducing non-productive work, developing local leadership and training a restricted group of locum paediatricians. Qualitative and quantitative information was analysed to retain or reject change ideas.
At baseline only 16%-17% of children were receiving appropriate care. The sequential changes resulted in a gradual improvement to a median of 63% of children receiving appropriate care by the end of 20 months.
We succeeded in establishing a paediatric emergency triage system and culture in the given setting through a unique enriching experience. We worked on removing systemic barriers and facilitating change while facing several unexpected outcomes. A sustained iterative approach may be the best way to achieving significant improvement in difficult settings like ours.
2015 年,Sitaram Bhartia 研究所的高级顾问在门诊看到了几个生病的孩子,这些孩子前一天曾在急诊就诊。这些孩子似乎需要住院治疗,但却被送回家。这促使我们审查我们急诊部门提供的儿科护理。
一个多学科团队成立来开展这项改进计划。文献回顾表明,围绕经过验证的分诊工具建立分诊系统将有助于我们提供更适当的护理。选择并改编了南非分诊量表。
目的是为至少 50%的儿童提供适当的护理,使用改进方法计划-执行-研究-行动 (PDSA) 循环测试了一系列连续干预措施,这是改善医疗保健研究所推荐的方法。上一个干预措施的 PDSA 循环中的学习帮助决定了随后的变更思路。干预措施包括使用工具培训、增加护士人员配备水平、利用团队会议作为反馈机会、引入护士提醒、减少非生产性工作、发展当地领导力和培训有限数量的临时工儿科医生。分析定性和定量信息以保留或拒绝变更思路。
基线时,只有 16%-17%的儿童接受了适当的护理。通过一系列的改变,到 20 个月结束时,中位数逐渐提高到 63%的儿童接受了适当的护理。
我们通过独特的丰富经验成功地在既定环境中建立了儿科急诊分诊系统和文化。我们致力于消除系统障碍并促进变革,同时面临着许多意外的结果。在像我们这样困难的环境中,持续的迭代方法可能是实现重大改进的最佳途径。