Suppr超能文献

脑小血管病的认知评估:朝着基于证据的参考标准识别方法迈进。第 1 部分。系统综述和定性数据综合。

Cognitive evaluation in cerebral small vessel disease: towards an evidence-based identification of the reference standards. Part 1. A systematic review and qualitative data synthesis.

机构信息

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Via di Scandicci, 269, 50143, Florence, Italy.

Neurology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2021 Dec;268(12):4563-4572. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10262-2. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is a leading cause of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Despite cSVD cognitive profile is thought to be mainly characterized by attention and executive functions deficits, there is no definite agreement on the standards for its evaluation. This systematic review aims at identifying cognitive domains and neuropsychological tools specifically chosen in the assessment of cognitive impairment related to cSVD, and the temporal and geographic trends in their utilization.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, original articles focused on cSVD patient samples neuropsychologically evaluated were searched using PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO databases without language or time restrictions (PROSPERO registration number CRD42018089882; date 27-02-2018).

RESULTS

We screened 13,688 studies and included 298 in the qualitative data synthesis. Global cognitive functioning and attention/executive functions were the most evaluated domains (87% and 69%, respectively). Mini Mental State Examination was the most used screening tool (73%), followed by MoCA (14%) whose utilization rapidly increased over the last years. The most frequently used second level tests were phonemic and semantic fluencies (39% and 30%, respectively), Trail Making Test (TMT) part A and B (31% and 32%, respectively), Stroop (31.5%), and Boston naming (30%). All tests resulted stably utilized over time, except for semantic fluency and Stroop whose use increased. Phonemic fluency and Boston naming were the most used in North America (51% and 45%, respectively), TMT in Europe (43%), and Stroop and semantic fluency in Asia (43% and 40%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review confirms that attention/executive functions domain is the most commonly evaluated in cSVD together with lexical retrieval abilities based on executive control processes. Temporal and geographic variability emerged in the choice of tests.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018089882 (27-02-2018).

摘要

背景

脑小血管病(cSVD)是老年人认知障碍的主要原因。尽管 cSVD 的认知特征被认为主要表现为注意力和执行功能缺陷,但在其评估标准方面尚未达成明确共识。本系统评价旨在确定专门用于评估与 cSVD 相关认知障碍的认知领域和神经心理学工具,以及它们在时间和地域上的利用趋势。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南,我们在没有语言或时间限制的情况下,使用 PubMed、Scopus 和 PsycINFO 数据库搜索了专门针对 cSVD 患者样本进行神经心理学评估的原始文章(PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42018089882;日期为 2018 年 2 月 27 日)。

结果

我们筛选了 13688 项研究,纳入了 298 项定性数据综合分析。总体认知功能和注意力/执行功能是评估最多的领域(分别为 87%和 69%)。简易精神状态检查是最常用的筛查工具(73%),其次是 MoCA(14%),其使用量在过去几年中迅速增加。最常用的二级测试是语音流畅性和语义流畅性(分别为 39%和 30%)、连线测试 A 和 B(分别为 31%和 32%)、Stroop 测试(31.5%)和波士顿命名测试(30%)。所有测试的使用在时间上都保持稳定,除了语义流畅性和 Stroop 测试的使用有所增加。语音流畅性和波士顿命名测试在北美(分别为 51%和 45%)最常用,连线测试在欧洲(43%)最常用,Stroop 和语义流畅性在亚洲(分别为 43%和 40%)最常用。

结论

本系统评价证实,注意力/执行功能领域是 cSVD 最常评估的领域,同时还评估了基于执行控制过程的词汇检索能力。测试选择在时间和地域上存在差异。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018089882(2018 年 2 月 27 日)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验