Department of Gerontological and Oncology Nursing, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Jun;36(3):452-462. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01890-3. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
The emerging discipline of oncofertility advocates for the timely provision of fertility preservation (FP) to all cancer patients of childbearing age by healthcare providers. A lack of practice due to limited FP-related knowledge was found among healthcare providers. A systematic review was undertaken on the educational programs on FP for healthcare providers. An initial search was performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases in October 2019. This review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Among the 160 articles that were identified, five relevant articles published between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Of the five studies, three were quantitative nonrandomized studies, one was a randomized controlled trial, and one was a qualitative study. Three programs were relevant to oncology nurses, one was relevant to social workers as well as nurses, and one was relevant to oncology fellows and residents. The four programs significantly increased healthcare providers' knowledge about FP, but clinical practice was only improved in the Educating Nurses about Reproductive Issues in Cancer Healthcare program (P < 0.01). Nevertheless, most of the studies used a self-made questionnaire or tool to assess the effects of the training programs. The educational programs improved the FP-related knowledge of healthcare providers but lacked the high-quality randomized controlled trials needed to provide robust evidence on the effectiveness of training programs using standard tools. More training projects should be developed based on learning theories or models to improve oncofertility care in clinical practice.
新兴的肿瘤生育学领域主张医疗保健提供者应为所有育龄期癌症患者及时提供生育力保存(FP)。研究发现,医疗保健提供者由于 FP 相关知识有限,实践不足。对医疗保健提供者 FP 教育计划进行了系统评价。2019 年 10 月,在 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了初步检索。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目。在确定的 160 篇文章中,回顾了 2009 年至 2019 年期间发表的 5 篇相关文章。在五项研究中,三项为定量非随机研究,一项为随机对照试验,一项为定性研究。有三个项目与肿瘤护士有关,一个与社会工作者和护士有关,一个与肿瘤研究员和住院医师有关。这四个项目显著提高了医疗保健提供者对 FP 的知识,但只有“在癌症保健中教育护士生殖问题”(Educating Nurses about Reproductive Issues in Cancer Healthcare,ENRICH)项目提高了临床实践(P<0.01)。然而,大多数研究使用自制问卷或工具来评估培训计划的效果。教育计划提高了医疗保健提供者的 FP 相关知识,但缺乏使用标准工具提供培训计划有效性的高质量随机对照试验证据。应根据学习理论或模型开发更多的培训项目,以改善临床实践中的肿瘤生育护理。