School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science (BEES), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Irish Centre for Research in Applied Geosciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Environmental Sustainability and Health Institute (ESHI), Technological University Dublin.
Water Res. 2021 Jan 1;188:116496. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116496. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
Verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) are important agents of diarrhoeal disease in humans globally. As a noted waterborne disease, emphasis has been given to the study VTEC in surface waters, readily susceptible to microbial contamination. Conversely, the status of VTEC in potable groundwater sources, generally regarded as a "safe" drinking-water supply remains largely understudied. As such, this investigation presents the first scoping review seeking to determine the global prevalence of VTEC in groundwater supply sources intended for human consumption. Twenty-three peer-reviewed studies were identified and included for data extraction. Groundwater sample and supply detection rates (estimated 0.6 and 1.3%, respectively) indicate VTEC is infrequently present in domestic groundwater sources. However, where generic (fecal indicator) E. coli are present, the VTEC to E. coli ratio was found to be 9.9%, representing a latent health concern for groundwater consumers. Geographically, extracted data indicates higher VTEC detection rates in urban (5.4%) and peri‑urban (4.9%) environments than in rural areas (0.9%); however, this finding is confounded by the predominance of research studies in lower income regions. Climate trends indicate local environments classified as 'temperate' (14/554; 2.5%) and 'cold' (8/392; 2%) accounted for a majority of supply sources with VTEC present, with similar detection rates encountered among supplies sampled during periods typically characterized by 'high' precipitation (15/649; 2.3%). Proposed prevalence figures may find application in preventive risk-based catchment and groundwater quality management including development of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessments (QMRA). Notwithstanding, to an extent, a large geographical disparity in available investigations, lack of standardized reporting, and bias in source selection, restrict the transferability of research findings. Overall, the mechanisms responsible for VTEC transport and ingress into groundwater supplies remain ambiguous, representing a critical knowledge gap, and denoting a distinctive lack of integration between hydrogeological and public health research. Key recommendations and guidelines are provided for prospective studies directed at increasingly integrative and multi-disciplinary research.
产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(VTEC)是全球人类腹泻病的重要病原体。作为一种著名的水源性疾病,人们一直关注地表水(易受微生物污染)中 VTEC 的研究。相反,在饮用水源地下水中 VTEC 的情况则在很大程度上仍未得到充分研究,这些水通常被认为是“安全”的饮用水供应。因此,本研究首次进行了范围界定审查,以确定用于人类消费的地下水供应源中 VTEC 的全球流行率。确定了 23 项同行评审研究进行数据提取。地下水样本和供应检测率(分别估计为 0.6%和 1.3%)表明,VTEC 很少存在于国内地下水源中。然而,在存在通用(粪便指示菌)大肠杆菌的情况下,VTEC 与大肠杆菌的比例为 9.9%,这对地下水消费者的健康构成了潜在威胁。从地理位置上看,提取的数据表明,城市(5.4%)和城郊(4.9%)环境中的 VTEC 检测率高于农村地区(0.9%);然而,这一发现受到低收入地区研究的主导地位的影响。气候趋势表明,被归类为“温带”(14/554;2.5%)和“寒冷”(8/392;2%)的当地环境占存在 VTEC 的供应源的大多数,在高降水期(15/649;2.3%)采集的供应样本中也遇到了类似的检测率。提出的流行率可能会在基于风险的集水区和地下水质量管理中得到应用,包括开发定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)。尽管如此,在某种程度上,由于调查的地域差异很大,缺乏标准化报告以及对水源选择的偏见,限制了研究结果的可转移性。总体而言,VTEC 进入地下水供应的传输和进入机制仍不清楚,这代表了一个关键的知识空白,也表明水文地质和公共卫生研究之间缺乏明显的整合。为了针对越来越综合和多学科的研究,提出了一些关键建议和指导方针。