Dell'Amore Andrea, Congiu Stefano, Campisi Alessio, Mazzarra Sara, Zanoni Silvia, Giunta Domenica
Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, S. Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, BO Italy.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jul;36(4):388-396. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00880-5. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Post-sternotomy dehiscence and mediastinitis remains a serious complication in cardiothoracic surgery. The aim of this work is to report our experience over a period of 8 years in the surgical treatment and risk factor analyses of post-sternotomy dehiscence and mediastinitis.
All patients treated for post-sternotomy dehiscence at our Thoracic Surgery Unit in the last 8 years were retrospectively collected. We identified 237 patients with post-sternotomy dehiscence/mediastinitis. Forty-two patients had simple fractures of the metal steel wires, 61 had an asymmetric sternotomy with multiple sternal fractures, 113 had a symmetric sternotomy with multiple sternal fractures, 14 had a failed Robicsek procedure, and 7 had sternal dehiscence with mediastinal abscess.
Different surgical techniques and materials were used to repair the sternum. In 21 patients, the first revision failed and a second reoperation was required. At multivariate analyses, we have identified risk factors for revision failure and in-hospital mortality. Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent more than one surgical revision (8% vs 19%, < 0.001).
Patients with sternal dehiscence are very fragile due to multiple preoperative comorbidities as reflected by postoperative morbidity and risk factors for in-hospital mortality. A correct evaluation of the characteristics of sternal dehiscence is important to guide the most appropriate repair strategy. Patients who need repeated sternal revisions had a higher mortality. Further randomized studies are needed to evaluate different techniques and medical devices to define the procedure to reduce significantly sternal wound complications in high-risk patients as defined by well-known risk factors.
胸骨切开术后切口裂开和纵隔炎仍然是心胸外科手术中的严重并发症。本研究旨在报告我们在8年时间里对胸骨切开术后切口裂开和纵隔炎进行外科治疗及危险因素分析的经验。
回顾性收集过去8年在我们胸外科接受胸骨切开术后切口裂开治疗的所有患者。我们确定了237例胸骨切开术后切口裂开/纵隔炎患者。其中42例为金属钢丝单纯断裂,61例为不对称胸骨切开术伴多处胸骨骨折,113例为对称胸骨切开术伴多处胸骨骨折,14例为罗比克塞克手术失败,7例为胸骨裂开伴纵隔脓肿。
采用不同的手术技术和材料修复胸骨。21例患者首次翻修失败,需要进行二次手术。多因素分析确定了翻修失败和院内死亡的危险因素。接受多次手术翻修的患者死亡率显著更高(8%对19%,P<0.001)。
胸骨裂开患者由于术前多种合并症而非常脆弱,这在术后发病率和院内死亡危险因素中得到体现。正确评估胸骨裂开的特征对于指导最合适的修复策略很重要。需要反复进行胸骨翻修的患者死亡率更高。需要进一步的随机研究来评估不同的技术和医疗设备,以确定能够显著降低由已知危险因素定义的高危患者胸骨伤口并发症的手术方法。