Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240881. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of three different programs, i.e. active dynamic warm-up program plus functional resistance warm-up using Theraband plus pre-shot routine program (AFPR); pre-shot routine program (PR); and active dynamic warm-up program plus functional resistance warm-up using Theraband (AF) on driver club head speed, driving distance, and driving accuracy in the amateur golfers. Fifteen amateur golfers with an average age of 19.67 ± 0.89 years and 4.87 ± 1.77 points of average handicap were assigned to participate in either AFPR, PR or AF program. All participants in the three programs practiced three sessions on non-consecutive days per week during the intervention phase. Each participant's performance was assessed before and after six weeks of the program through hitting ten maximal drives with the ball flight and swing analyzed using the P3ProSwing Golf Simulator and recorded for the driver club head speed, driving distance, and driving accuracy. Multivariate analysis of variance showed no statistically significant differences (P < .05) of the performances of the golfers participated in the 3 programs (club head speed: F = 1.02, P = 0.33; accuracy: F = 0.32, P = 0.72; distance: F = 0.18, P = 0.83). Furthermore, a paired t-tests also showed no statistically significant (P < .05) improvement occurred in the 3 programs after the six-week training. Although the effect of the 3 programs did not show statistically significant increase in the performance of the amateur golfers, however, the three parameters of the performance, i.e. the driver club head speed, the driving distance and the driving accuracy showed certain improvements. The 3 training programs may have benefit to the amateur golfers with certain increases of their performance.
本研究旨在评估三种不同方案对业余高尔夫球手的发球杆杆头速度、击球距离和击球准确性的影响,这三种方案分别为:主动动态热身方案加 Theraband 功能性抗阻热身加预击球常规程序方案(AFPR);预击球常规程序方案(PR);主动动态热身方案加 Theraband 功能性抗阻热身方案(AF)。15 名年龄为 19.67±0.89 岁、平均差点为 4.87±1.77 的业余高尔夫球手被分配到 AFPR、PR 或 AF 方案组。所有参与者在干预阶段每周非连续三天进行三次练习。在方案实施六周前后,每位参与者通过用 P3ProSwing 高尔夫模拟器分析球的飞行轨迹和挥杆动作来击打十次最大挥杆,以评估其表现,记录发球杆杆头速度、击球距离和击球准确性。多变量方差分析显示,参加三个方案的高尔夫球手的表现没有统计学上的显著差异(P<0.05)(杆头速度:F=1.02,P=0.33;准确性:F=0.32,P=0.72;距离:F=0.18,P=0.83)。此外,配对 t 检验也显示,三个方案在六周训练后没有统计学上的显著改善(P<0.05)。尽管这三个方案对业余高尔夫球手的表现没有显示出统计学上的显著提高,但三个表现参数,即发球杆杆头速度、击球距离和击球准确性都有一定的提高。这三个训练方案可能对业余高尔夫球手有一定的益处,可以提高他们的表现。