Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2020 Jan-Dec;34:2058738420959554. doi: 10.1177/2058738420959554.
The present review aimed to consolidate and analyze the recent information about the use of zebrafish in studies concerning cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and otoprotection.
The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databanks were searched using the following MESH terms: zebrafish, cisplatin, ototoxicity. The identified publications were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the 26 qualifying manuscripts were included in the full-text analysis. The experimental protocols, including cisplatin concentrations, the exposure duration and the outcome measurements used in zebrafish larvae studies, were evaluated and the reported knowledge was summarized.
Twenty-six substances protecting from cisplatin-induced toxicity were identified with the use of zebrafish larvae. These substances include quinine, salvianolic acid B, berbamine 6, benzamil, quercetin, dexmedetomidine, dexamethsanone, quinoxaline, edaravone, apocynin, dimethyl sulfoxide, KR-22335, SRT1720, ORC-13661, 3-MA, D-methionine, mdivi-1, FUT-175, rapamycin, Z-LLF-CHO, ATX, NAC, CYM-5478, CHCP1, CHCP2 and leupeptin. The otoprotective effects of compounds were attributed to their anti-ROS, anti-apoptotic and cisplatin uptake-blocking properties. The broadest range of protection was achieved when the experimental flow used preconditioning with an otoprotective compound and later a co-incubation with cisplatin. Protection against a high concentration of cisplatin was observed only in protocols using short exposure times (4 and 6 h).
The data extracted from the selected papers confirm that despite the differences between the human and the zebra fish hearing thresholds (as affected by cisplatin), the sensory cells of zebrafish and larval zebrafish are a valuable tool which could be used: (i) for the discovery of novel otoprotective substances and compounds; (ii) to screen their side effects and (iii) to extend the knowledge on the mechanisms of cisplatin-induced inner ear damage. For future studies, the development of a consensus experimental protocol is highly recommended.
本综述旨在整合和分析最近关于斑马鱼在顺铂诱导耳毒性和耳保护研究中的应用的信息。
使用以下 MeSH 术语在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中进行搜索:斑马鱼、顺铂、耳毒性。根据纳入和排除标准筛选已识别的出版物,并对 26 篇符合条件的手稿进行全文分析。评估了使用斑马鱼幼虫的实验方案,包括顺铂浓度、暴露持续时间和使用的结局测量,总结了报告的知识。
使用斑马鱼幼虫鉴定出 26 种可预防顺铂诱导毒性的物质。这些物质包括奎宁、丹酚酸 B、小檗胺 6、苯甲咪、槲皮素、右美托咪定、地塞米松酮、喹喔啉、依达拉奉、apocynin、二甲基亚砜、KR-22335、SRT1720、ORC-13661、3-MA、D-蛋氨酸、mdivi-1、FUT-175、雷帕霉素、Z-LLF-CHO、ATX、NAC、CYM-5478、CHCP1、CHCP2 和亮抑酶肽。化合物的耳保护作用归因于其抗 ROS、抗凋亡和阻断顺铂摄取的特性。当实验流程使用耳保护化合物进行预处理,然后与顺铂共孵育时,观察到最广泛的保护范围。仅在使用短暴露时间(4 和 6 小时)的方案中观察到对高浓度顺铂的保护。
从选定论文中提取的数据证实,尽管人类和斑马鱼的听力阈值(受顺铂影响)存在差异,但斑马鱼的感觉细胞和幼鱼是一种有价值的工具,可以用于:(i)发现新的耳保护物质和化合物;(ii)筛选其副作用;(iii)扩展顺铂诱导内耳损伤的机制知识。对于未来的研究,强烈建议制定一个共识实验方案。