Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1562-1572. doi: 10.1002/clc.23481. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
The left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) makes the ventricular depolarization closer to the physiological state and shortens QRS duration. The purpose of this study is to explore the ventricular systolic mechanical synchronization after LBBP in comparison with traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP) using two-dimensional strain echocardiography (2D-STE).
Thirty-two patients who received LBBP (n = 16) or RVP (n = 16) from October 2018 to October 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were included in this retrospective study. Electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics, pacing parameters, pacing sites, and safety events were assessed before and after implantation. Acquisition and analysis of ventricular systolic synchronization were implemented using 2D-STE.
In RVP group, ECG showed left bundle branch block patterns. At LBBP, QRS morphology was in the form of right bundle branch block, and QRS durations were significantly shorter than that of the RVP QRS (109.38 ± 12.89 vs 149.38 \± 19.40 ms, P < .001). Both the maximum time differences (TD) and SDs of the 18-segments systolic time to peak systolic strain were significantly shorter under LBBP than under RVP (TD, 66.62 ± 37.2 vs 148.62 ± 43.67 ms, P < .01; SD, 21.80 ± 12.13 vs 52.70 ± 17.72 ms, P < .01), indicating that LBBP could provide better left ventricular mechanical synchronization. Left and right ventricular pre-ejection period difference was significantly longer in RVP group than in LBBP group (10.23 ± 3.07 vs 39.94 ± 14.81 ms, P < .05), indicating left and right ventricular contraction synchronization in LBBP group being better than in RVP group.
LBBP is able to provide a physiologic ventricular activation pattern, which results in ventricular mechanical contraction synchronization.
左束支起搏(LBBP)使心室去极化更接近生理状态,并缩短 QRS 时限。本研究旨在通过二维应变成像(2D-STE)比较 LBBP 与传统右心室起搏(RVP)后的心室收缩机械同步性。
回顾性纳入 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 10 月因符合纳入标准而接受 LBBP(n=16)或 RVP(n=16)的 32 例患者。评估植入前后心电图(ECG)特征、起搏参数、起搏部位和安全性事件。使用 2D-STE 进行心室收缩同步性的采集和分析。
在 RVP 组,心电图表现为左束支阻滞图形。在 LBBP 时,QRS 形态呈右束支阻滞,QRS 时限明显短于 RVP QRS(109.38±12.89 vs 149.38±19.40 ms,P<.001)。LBBP 时 18 节段收缩时达收缩应变峰值的最大时间差(TD)和标准差(SD)均显著短于 RVP(TD,66.62±37.2 vs 148.62±43.67 ms,P<.01;SD,21.80±12.13 vs 52.70±17.72 ms,P<.01),表明 LBBP 能提供更好的左心室机械同步性。RVP 组左、右心室射血前期差异明显长于 LBBP 组(10.23±3.07 vs 39.94±14.81 ms,P<.05),表明 LBBP 组左、右心室收缩同步性优于 RVP 组。
LBBP 可提供生理性心室激动模式,从而使心室机械收缩同步。