Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Gustave L Levy Place, New York, USA.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Jan;27(1):72-78. doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.19282.
To report the technical successes, adverse events, and long-term stent patency rates of Gianturco Z-stents for management of chronic central venous occlusive disease.
Overall, 137 patients, with mean age 48.6±16.1 years (range, 16-89 years), underwent placement of Gianturco Z-stents for chronic central venous occlusions. Presenting symptoms included lower extremity edema (n=66, 48.2%), superior vena cava syndrome (n=30, 21.9%), unilateral upper extremity swelling (n=20, 14.6%), hemodialysis fistula or catheter dysfunction (n=11, 8.0%), ascites (n=8, 5.8%), and both ascites and lower extremity edema (n=2, 1.5%). Most common etiologies of central venous occlusion were prior central venous access placement (n=58, 42.3%), extrinsic compression (n=29, 21.2%), and post-surgical anastomotic stenosis (n=27, 19.7%). Number of stents placed, stent implantation location, stent sizes, technical successes, adverse events, need for re-intervention, follow-up evaluation, stent patencies, and mortality were recorded. Technical success was defined as recanalization and stent reconstruction with restoration of in-line venous flow. Adverse events were defined by the Society of Interventional Radiology Adverse Event Classification criteria. Primary and primary-assisted stent patencies were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
In total, 208 Z-stents were placed. The three most common placement sites were the inferior vena cava (n=124, 59.6%), superior vena cava (n=44, 21.2%), and brachiocephalic veins (n=27, 13.0%). Technical success was achieved in 133 patients (97.1%). There were two (1.5%) severe adverse events (two cases of stent migration to the right atrium), one (0.7%) moderate adverse event, and one (0.7%) mild adverse event. Mean follow-up was 43.6±52.7 months. Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year primary stent patency was 84.2%, 84.2%, and 82.1%, respectively. Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-year primary-assisted patency was 92.3%, 89.6%, and 89.6%, respectively. The 30- and 60- day mortality rates were 2.9% (n=4) and 5.1% (n=7), none of which were directly attributable to Z-stent placement.
Gianturco Z-stent placement is safe and effective for the treatment for chronic central venous occlusive disease with durable short- and long-term patencies.
报告用于治疗慢性中心静脉阻塞性疾病的 Gianturco Z 支架的技术成功率、不良事件和长期支架通畅率。
共有 137 例患者,平均年龄 48.6±16.1 岁(范围 16-89 岁),因慢性中心静脉阻塞接受 Gianturco Z 支架置入。主要临床表现为下肢水肿(n=66,48.2%)、上腔静脉综合征(n=30,21.9%)、单侧上肢肿胀(n=20,14.6%)、血液透析瘘或导管功能障碍(n=11,8.0%)、腹水(n=8,5.8%)和下肢水肿及腹水(n=2,1.5%)。中心静脉阻塞的主要病因是先前的中心静脉通路置入(n=58,42.3%)、外压(n=29,21.2%)和术后吻合口狭窄(n=27,19.7%)。记录支架数量、支架植入部位、支架尺寸、技术成功率、不良事件、再次干预的需要、随访评估、支架通畅率和死亡率。技术成功定义为再通和支架重建,静脉血流恢复直线。不良事件按介入放射学学会不良事件分类标准定义。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估主要和主要辅助支架通畅率。
共置入 208 个 Z 支架。最常见的三个植入部位是下腔静脉(n=124,59.6%)、上腔静脉(n=44,21.2%)和头臂静脉(n=27,13.0%)。133 例患者(97.1%)达到技术成功。有 2 例(1.5%)严重不良事件(2 例支架迁移至右心房)、1 例(0.7%)中度不良事件和 1 例(0.7%)轻度不良事件。平均随访时间为 43.6±52.7 个月。估计 1、3 和 5 年的主要支架通畅率分别为 84.2%、84.2%和 82.1%。估计 1、3 和 5 年的主要辅助通畅率分别为 92.3%、89.6%和 89.6%。30 天和 60 天的死亡率分别为 2.9%(n=4)和 5.1%(n=7),均与 Z 支架放置无关。
Gianturco Z 支架置入治疗慢性中心静脉阻塞性疾病安全有效,具有持久的短期和长期通畅率。