Department of Psychology.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 May;120(5):1386-1414. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000370. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
Theories of narcissism emphasize the dynamic processes within and between grandiosity and vulnerability. Research seeking to address this has either not studied grandiosity and vulnerability together or has used dispositional measures to assess what are considered to be momentary states. Emerging models of narcissism suggest grandiosity and vulnerability can further be differentiated into a three-factor structure-Exhibitionistic Grandiosity, Entitlement, and Vulnerability. Research in other areas of maladaptive personality (e.g., borderline personality disorder) has made headway in engaging data collection and analytic methods that are specifically meant to examine such questions. The present study took an exploratory approach to studying fluctuations within and between grandiose and vulnerable states. Fluctuations-operationalized as gross variability, instability, and lagged effects-were examined across three samples (two undergraduate and a community sample oversampled for narcissistic features; total person N = 862, total observation N = 36,631). Results suggest variability in narcissistic states from moment to moment is moderately associated with dispositional assessments of narcissism. Specifically, individuals who are dispositionally grandiose express both grandiosity and vulnerability, and vary in their overall levels of grandiosity and vulnerability over time. On the other hand, dispositionally vulnerable individuals tend to have high levels of vulnerability and low levels of grandiosity. Entitlement plays a key role in the processes that underlie narcissism and narcissistic processes appear unique to the construct and not reflective of broader psychological processes (e.g., self-esteem). Future research should consider using similar methods and statistical techniques on different timescales to study dynamics within narcissism. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
自恋理论强调自大和脆弱之间的动态过程。为了解决这个问题的研究,要么没有一起研究自大和脆弱,要么使用性格测量来评估被认为是瞬间状态的东西。新兴的自恋模型表明,自大和脆弱可以进一步分为三个因素结构——表现型自大、权利感和脆弱性。其他适应不良人格领域(例如边缘型人格障碍)的研究在参与专门用于研究此类问题的数据收集和分析方法方面取得了进展。本研究采用探索性方法研究了自大和脆弱状态的内部和之间的波动。波动——表现为总变异、不稳定性和滞后效应——在三个样本中进行了检查(两个本科生样本和一个有自恋特征的社区样本;总人数 N=862,总观察数 N=36631)。结果表明,自恋状态的波动与自恋的性格评估有中度关联。具体来说,性格上自负的个体既表现出自大又表现出脆弱,并且随着时间的推移,其总体自大和脆弱水平也有所变化。另一方面,性格上脆弱的个体往往具有较高的脆弱水平和较低的自大水平。权利感在自恋的潜在过程中起着关键作用,自恋过程似乎是该结构特有的,而不是反映更广泛的心理过程(例如自尊)。未来的研究应该考虑在不同的时间尺度上使用类似的方法和统计技术来研究自恋内部的动态。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。