Sadeh Naomi, Miglin Rickie, Bounoua Nadia, Beckford Emil, Estrada Suzanne, Baskin-Sommers Arielle
University of Delaware, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 105 The Green, Newark, DE 19716, United States.
Yale University, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 208205, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.
Addict Behav. 2021 Feb;113:106710. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106710. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
To develop personalized interventions and improve outcomes in substance-using populations, research is needed on the heterogeneity in substance use patterns and motivations that exists among adult substance users. This study took a person-centered approach to identify profiles of lifetime substance use and discern the psychosocial differences among them. To survey a spectrum of drug use severity, 1106 adults (43.4% women) were recruited from forensic and community samples. Participants reported on the frequency of lifetime substance use across multiple drug categories (sedatives, stimulants, marijuana, heroin, hallucinogens, misuse of prescription drugs) and alcohol use. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct profiles of substance use that were then compared on potential risk and maintenance factors for substance use. Four profiles of lifetime substance use emerged that diverged on severity of use and degree of mono vs. polysubstance use (Recreational Marijuana Use, Heavy Multidrug Intoxication, Heavy Marijuana Use, and Heavy Opioid and Polysubstance Use). The profiles differed on affective motivations for substance use (e.g., using to cope vs. using to seek a thrill), age of use onset, drug-related functional impairment, and experiences of childhood maltreatment. Cognitive functioning did not differentiate the heavy substance use profiles. Results provide compelling initial evidence that lifetime patterns of use can be used to identify groups of substance users with distinct risk and maintenance factors. Results highlight affective motivations for substance use and maltreatment history as potential treatment targets and underscore the importance of studying polysubstance use in the context of the opioid epidemic.
为了制定个性化干预措施并改善物质使用人群的治疗效果,需要对成年物质使用者中存在的物质使用模式和动机的异质性进行研究。本研究采用以人为本的方法来确定终生物质使用概况,并辨别其中的心理社会差异。为了调查一系列药物使用严重程度,从法医和社区样本中招募了1106名成年人(43.4%为女性)。参与者报告了多种药物类别(镇静剂、兴奋剂、大麻、海洛因、致幻剂、处方药滥用)和酒精使用的终生物质使用频率。潜在类别分析用于识别不同的物质使用概况,然后在物质使用的潜在风险和维持因素方面进行比较。出现了四种终生物质使用概况,在使用严重程度和单一物质使用与多物质使用程度上存在差异(娱乐性大麻使用、重度多药中毒、重度大麻使用以及重度阿片类药物和多物质使用)。这些概况在物质使用的情感动机(例如,用于应对与用于寻求刺激)、使用开始年龄、与药物相关的功能损害以及童年虐待经历方面存在差异。认知功能并未区分重度物质使用概况。结果提供了令人信服的初步证据,表明终生使用模式可用于识别具有不同风险和维持因素的物质使用人群。结果突出了物质使用的情感动机和虐待史作为潜在治疗靶点,并强调了在阿片类药物流行背景下研究多物质使用的重要性。