Suppr超能文献

评估无糖尿病和糖尿病前期人群连续血糖监测的参考指标。

Evaluation of Reference Metrics for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Persons Without Diabetes and Prediabetes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, NU-Hospital Group, Uddevalla, Sweden.

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):373-382. doi: 10.1177/1932296820965599. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines have been developed for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics in persons with diabetes. To understand what glucose profiles should be judged as normal in clinical practice and glucose-lowering trials, we examined the glucose profile of healthy individuals using CGM.

METHODS

Persons without diabetes or prediabetes were included after passing a normal oral glucose tolerance test, two-hour value <8.9 mmol/L (160 mg/dL), fasting glucose <6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL), and HbA1c <6.0% (<42 mmol/mol). CGM metrics were evaluated using the Dexcom G4 Platinum.

RESULTS

In total, 60 persons were included, mean age was 43.0 years, 70.0% were women, mean HbA1c was 5.3% (34 mmol/mol), and mean body mass index was 25.7 kg/m. Median and mean percent times in hypoglycemia <3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) were 1.6% (IQR 0.6-3.2), and 3.2% (95% CI 2.0; 4.3), respectively. For glucose levels <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL), the corresponding estimates were 0.0% (IQR 0.0-0.4) and 0.5% (95% CI 0.2; 0.8). Median and mean time-in-range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]) was 97.3% (IQR 95.4-98.7) and 95.4% (95% CI 94.0; 96.8), respectively. Median and mean standard deviations were 1.04 mmol/L (IQR 0.92-1.29) and 1.15 mmol/L (95% CI 1.05; 1.24), respectively. Measures of glycemic variability (standard deviation, coefficient of variation, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions) were significantly greater during daytime compared with nighttime, whereas others did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

People without prediabetes or diabetes show a non-negligible % time in hypoglycemia, median 1.6% and mean 3.2%, which needs to be accounted for in clinical practice and glucose-lowering trials. Glycemic variability measures differ day and night in this population.

摘要

背景

最近制定了糖尿病患者连续血糖监测(CGM)指标的指南。为了了解在临床实践和降糖试验中应将哪些血糖谱判断为正常,我们使用 CGM 检查了健康个体的血糖谱。

方法

通过正常口服葡萄糖耐量试验、两小时值<8.9mmol/L(160mg/dL)、空腹血糖<6.1mmol/L(110mg/dL)和 HbA1c<6.0%(<42mmol/mol)后,纳入无糖尿病或糖尿病前期的个体。使用 Dexcom G4 Platinum 评估 CGM 指标。

结果

共纳入 60 名个体,平均年龄为 43.0 岁,70.0%为女性,平均 HbA1c 为 5.3%(34mmol/mol),平均体重指数为 25.7kg/m2。中位数和平均低血糖时间<3.9mmol/L(70mg/dL)分别为 1.6%(IQR 0.6-3.2)和 3.2%(95%CI 2.0-4.3)。对于血糖水平<3.0mmol/L(54mg/dL),相应的估计值分别为 0.0%(IQR 0.0-0.4)和 0.5%(95%CI 0.2-0.8)。中位数和平均血糖范围内时间(3.9-10.0mmol/L[70-180mg/dL])分别为 97.3%(IQR 95.4-98.7)和 95.4%(95%CI 94.0-96.8)。中位数和平均标准差分别为 1.04mmol/L(IQR 0.92-1.29)和 1.15mmol/L(95%CI 1.05-1.24)。血糖变异性(标准差、变异系数、血糖波动幅度)测量值白天明显高于夜间,而其他指标则没有差异。

结论

无糖尿病前期或糖尿病的个体出现低血糖时间百分比较高,中位数为 1.6%,平均值为 3.2%,这在临床实践和降糖试验中需要加以考虑。在该人群中,血糖变异性测量值在白天和夜间存在差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Reference Metrics for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Persons Without Diabetes and Prediabetes.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):373-382. doi: 10.1177/1932296820965599. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Glucose levels measured with continuous glucose monitoring in uncomplicated pregnancies.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 May 10;12(3):e003989. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003989.
7
Personalized Postprandial Glucose Response-Targeting Diet Versus Mediterranean Diet for Glycemic Control in Prediabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Sep;44(9):1980-1991. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0162. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
9
Beyond HbA1c.
J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;9(12):1052-1053. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12590. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Diagnose Stage 2 Type 1 Diabetes.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 May 30:19322968251333441. doi: 10.1177/19322968251333441.
2
Screening for Impaired Glucose Homeostasis: A Novel Metric of Glycemic Control.
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 May 24;1(2):189-200. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.02.008. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Weight-neutral early time-restricted eating improves glycemic variation and time in range without changes in inflammatory markers.
iScience. 2024 Nov 29;27(12):111501. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111501. eCollection 2024 Dec 20.
5
Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Prediabetes: What Are the Best Metrics?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):835-846. doi: 10.1177/19322968241242487. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
6
Time in Range Analysis in Automated Insulin Delivery Era: Should Day and Nighttime Targets be the Same?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 19:19322968241236456. doi: 10.1177/19322968241236456.
7
Best practices in collecting and reporting continuous glucose monitoring data in research settings.
Nat Metab. 2024 Feb;6(2):189-191. doi: 10.1038/s42255-024-00973-5.
8
Dual-basal-insulin regimen for the management of dawn phenomenon in children with type 1 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Dec 25;14:20420188231220130. doi: 10.1177/20420188231220130. eCollection 2023.
9
Regulation of the Cortisol Axis, Glucagon, and Growth Hormone by Glucose Is Altered in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jan 18;109(2):e675-e688. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad549.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Head-to-Head Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL in Type 1 Diabetes.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Aug;22(8):553-561. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0027. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
2
Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1707-1717. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907863. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
6
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles in Healthy Nondiabetic Participants: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Oct 1;104(10):4356-4364. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-02763.
8
Validation of Time in Range as an Outcome Measure for Diabetes Clinical Trials.
Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):400-405. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1444. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jun;20(6):395-402. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0150. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验