Zhou Liangbin, Gjvm Van Osch, Malda Jos, Stoddart Martin J, Lai Yuxiao, Richards R Geoff, Ki-Wai Ho Kevin, Qin Ling
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory of Department of Orthopedics & Traumatology, and Innovative Orthopaedic Biomaterial and Drug Translational Research Laboratory of Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Department of Orthopedics and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3000 CA, The Netherlands.
Adv Healthc Mater. 2020 Dec;9(23):e2001008. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202001008. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Clinical treatments for the repair of osteochondral defects (OCD) are merely palliative, not completely curative, and thus enormously unfulfilled challenges. With the in-depth studies of biology, medicine, materials, and engineering technology, the conception of OCD repair and regeneration should be renewed. During the past decades, many innovative tissue-engineered approaches for repairing and regenerating damaged osteochondral units have been widely explored. Various scaffold-free and scaffold-based strategies, such as monophasic, biphasic, and currently fabricated multiphasic and gradient architectures have been proposed and evaluated. Meanwhile, progenitor cells and tissue-specific cells have also been intensively investigated in vivo as well as ex vivo. Concerning bioactive factors and drugs, they have been combined with scaffolds and/or living cells, and even released in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. Although tremendous progress has been achieved, further research and development (R&D) is needed to convert preclinical outcomes into clinical applications. Here, the osteochondral unit structure, its defect classifications, and diagnosis are summarized. Commonly used clinical reparative techniques, tissue-engineered strategies, emerging 3D-bioprinting technologies, and the status of their clinical applications are discussed. Existing challenges to translation are also discussed and potential solutions for future R&D directions are proposed.
修复骨软骨缺损(OCD)的临床治疗仅仅是姑息性的,而非完全治愈性的,因此面临着巨大的未解决挑战。随着生物学、医学、材料学和工程技术的深入研究,骨软骨缺损修复与再生的概念应予以更新。在过去几十年中,人们广泛探索了许多用于修复和再生受损骨软骨单元的创新性组织工程方法。已经提出并评估了各种无支架和基于支架的策略,如单相、双相以及目前制造的多相和梯度结构。同时,祖细胞和组织特异性细胞也在体内和体外进行了深入研究。关于生物活性因子和药物,它们已与支架和/或活细胞结合,甚至以时空可控的方式释放。尽管已取得巨大进展,但仍需要进一步的研发将临床前成果转化为临床应用。在此,总结了骨软骨单元结构、其缺损分类和诊断。讨论了常用的临床修复技术、组织工程策略、新兴的3D生物打印技术及其临床应用现状。还讨论了转化过程中存在的挑战,并提出了未来研发方向的潜在解决方案。